The usual Besicovitch's covering theorem concerns closed balls in $\mathbb{R}^d$. It relies on a property called "directionally limited metric space": the principal ingredient is to say that there can't be too many euclidian balls in $\mathbb{R}^d$ with non empty intersection, and such that their respective centers belong to only one ball. The "too many" here is a number that depends only on the dimension $d$.

I am interested in the problem where inside $\mathbb{R}^d$ you consider ellipsoids instead of balls. The ellipsoids I am interested in have a priori unbounded eccentricity, but I am asking a condition of the length of the axis. They have to be of the form $R^{\alpha}$ with, say, $R<1$ and $1<\alpha<\alpha_0$ for some uniform $\alpha_0$.

My question: Would that be possible to play the "directionally limited game" with those hypothesis?

My motivation: I am interested in extending the theory of Borel's differentiation of Radon measure on the sphere at infinity $N(\infty)$ of a simply connected Riemannian manifold $N$ whose sectional curvature is pinched between two negative constants (in my case, in order to simplify, I ask $N$ to cover a closed manifold $M$). This sphere is not a manifold: it only possesses a priori a Hölder structure.

Shadows would play the role of round balls in $\mathbb{R}^d$. To define them, choose $\epsilon>0$, and two points $z\in N$, and $\xi\in N(\infty)$. The shadow $\mathcal{O}_{\epsilon}(\xi,z)$ is defined as the set of extremities of those geodesics starting at $\xi$ and passing through the Riemannian ball centered at $z$ and of radius $\epsilon$.

It occurs that these shadows form a basis of the topology of $N(\infty)$, that they satisfy a covering theorem "à la Vitali" (this is due to Roblin, lemme 1.2.1), and that the Patterson-Sullivan measure satisfies a doubling condition (this is due to Sullivan's shadow lemma). Hence, the theory of Lebesgue's differentiation with respect to the PS measure holds.

For my purpose, I need a covering theorem "à la Besicovitch". And hence I have to play the "directionally limited game" with shadows, where the center of the shadow is played by the geodesic pasing through $\xi$ and $z$. One idea would be, given a family of intersecting shadows whose center only belongs to one shadow, to intersect the corresponding family of cones with a horosphere centered at $\xi$: the intersections would look exaclty like ellipsoids with a "polynomial" eccentricity, with a uniform exponent only depending on the pinching of the curvature. Pulling back by the exponential would enable us to come down to the euclidian case.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.