Reference for a strong intermediate value theorem for measures Let $\mu$ be a finite nonatomic measure on a measurable space $(X,\Sigma)$, and for simplicity assume that $\mu(X) = 1$. There is a well-known "intermediate value theorem" of Sierpiński that states that for every $t \in [0,1]$, there exists a set $S \in \Sigma$ with $\mu(S) = t$.
I would like to use the following stronger conclusion for such a measure: 

There exists a chain of sets $\{S_t \mid t \in [0,1]\}$ in $\Sigma$,
  with $S_t \subseteq S_r$ whenever $0 \leq s \leq r \leq 1$, such that
  $\mu(S_t) = t$ for all $t \in [0,1]$.

(One can view this as the existence a right inverse to the map $\mu \colon \Sigma \to [0,1]$ in the category of partially ordered sets.)
This statement appears (albeit hidden within a proof) on the Wikipedia page for "Atom (measure theory)," and even includes a sketch for the proof!  However, I would like to see some mention of this in the literature.  I've checked the Wiki references and they both seem to prove the weaker statement.  I looked in Fremiln's Measure Theory, vol. 2, and again found the weaker version but not the stronger.  
Question: Can anyone provide me with such a reference?

A proof. In case anyone stumbles to this page and wants to see a proof, I'll sketch one that is more constructive than the one that I linked to above.  Set $S_0 = \varnothing$ and $S_1 = X$. By Sierpiński, there exists $S_{1/2} \in \Sigma$ of measure $1/2$. For each Dyadic rational $q = m/2^n \in [0,1]$ ($1 \leq m \leq 2^n$), we may proceed by induction on $n$ to construct each $S_q$. Now given $r \in [0,1]$, set $S_r = \bigcup_{q \leq r} S_q$.  (This is essentially the same method of proof as the one in the reference provided in Ramiro de la Vega's answer.)
 A: I would say this is folklore (I proved it and used it many years ago on my undergrad thesis), but here is a concrete reference:
Such a family of measurable sets is called a $[0,1]$-family in On the Skorokhod representation theorem by Jean Carlos Cortissoz, PAMS, Vol.135, No. 12, 2007 (see Definition 4.1). A proof that such a family exists in any non-atomic space is given in Lemma 4.1. 
A: There's a stronger version of that (basic) theorem due to Lyapunov. It is stronger because it concerns vectors of measures, and not only a single measure. It states that given a non-atomic vector measure (a collection of $n$ measures $\mu_1,\ldots, \mu_n$ where each measure is non-atomic) always has an image which is convex (in $\mathbb{R}^n$).
Unfortunately, I could never find a translation of his paper, so I can only link the version in russian. The main statements can be found in French at the end of the paper. There's also a paper of Halmos that proves the result.
Maybe looking at the proof method or subsequent papers you can find the chain statement that you seek.
A: It seems to be a special case of Lemma 2.5(chapter 2) of "interpolation of operators"(Bennett, Sharpley).
A: It is also a special case of Theorem 15 (p. 43) in:

A. Fryszkowski, Fixed Point Theory for Decomposable Sets, Topological Fixed Point Theory and Its Applications 2, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004.

