17
$\begingroup$

Suppose that $X$ is a topological space and $\left(U_i \to X\right)$ is an open cover. We can associate to it the Cech diagram of this cover $$C_U:\Delta^{op} \to Top.$$ I know that for many good classes of topological spaces, the homotopy colimit of $C_U$ is $X$ (e.g. for manifolds). How general is this result? Does it hold e.g. for locally contractible spaces? I believe that In general $X$ is (weakly) homotopy equivalent to the fat geometric realization of $C_U$ (e.g. see Cor. 4.8 here: http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.3925) , but for a general simplicial space, this need not agree with hocolim. Any feedback or references would be appreciated. Thanks!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Quillen's Theorems A/B are relevant, maybe? $\endgroup$ – user43326 Nov 23 '14 at 11:01
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This is true in particular when the topos-theoretic shape functor $Sh$ agrees with the classical "underlying homotopy type" functor, since it's always true that $Sh(X)$ is the colimit of $Sh(C_U)$. Lurie shows that $Sh(X)$ is weakly equivalent to $X$ when $X$ is paracompact and homotopy equivalent to a CW complex (Higher Algebra, A.1.4). I'm not sure if you can generalize this to "locally contractible". It's not even clear to me that the shape of a contractible space is contractible... $\endgroup$ – Marc Hoyois Nov 23 '14 at 16:45
  • $\begingroup$ Well, not only is the shape homotopy invariant (Higher Algebra, A.2.10), but your question is actually answered completely in that appendix, see Remark A.3.8: the functor $Shv(X)\to \infty Gpd$ induced by the "underlying homotopy type" functor preserves all colimits! $\endgroup$ – Marc Hoyois Nov 23 '14 at 17:12
  • $\begingroup$ As a follow-up to my first comment, the proof of Lemma A.4.14 in HA shows the following. If $X$ is locally contractible, then $Map(Sh(X),K)\to Map(Sing(X),K)$ is an equivalence provided that the constant sheaf with fiber $K$ is hypercomplete. In particular, $Sing(X)$ and $Sh(X)$ have the same pro-truncated reflections. I suspect they're not the same in general because the usual definition of "locally contractible" for a space corresponds to the topos being "locally $\infty$-connective" rather than actually "locally contractible". $\endgroup$ – Marc Hoyois Nov 24 '14 at 1:53
  • $\begingroup$ The answer probably depends on the chosen weak equivalences in $\mathrm{Top}$, right? For homotopy equivalences you probably need a condition like numerable (see the reference to tom Dieck's book in Ronnie Brown's answer). In the same book, Thm 6.7.11 essentially shows that the same thing holds in complete generality for weak homotopy equivalences (as in Marc's answer, but in more classical language). $\endgroup$ – Lennart Meier Apr 13 '17 at 8:17
17
$\begingroup$

It is true in complete generality that $X$ is the homotopy colimit of $C_U$ (and hence that the fat realization computes the homotopy colimit in this case). This is a special case of Lurie's version of the Seifert-van Kampen theorem. More precisely, Proposition A.3.2 in Higher Algebra says that that the "underlying homotopy type" functor

$$Sing: Open(X) \to \mathcal{S} $$

is a cosheaf, so it lifts to a colimit-preserving functor $Shv(X) \to \mathcal{S}$. Since $X$ is the colimit of $C_U$ in $Shv(X)$, $Sing(X)$ is the colimit of $Sing(C_U)$ in $\mathcal{S}$.

ETA: The proof of the above result actually shows that $Sing$ is a hypercomplete cosheaf. This reminded me that Dugger and Isaksen also prove this fact in their paper Hypercovers in topology.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ My question mathoverflow.net/questions/102295/… is relevant to your comment. Note that this sometimes called "small simplex" theorem has other proofs in the literature, and has not led to proofs of higher Seifert-van Kampen Theorems, to my knowledge. $\endgroup$ – Ronnie Brown Nov 23 '14 at 20:42
  • $\begingroup$ I think it would be unfair not to call Lurie's theorem itself a higher Seifert-van Kampen theorem. Note that the result I've quoted is only a special case of half of the theorem. The other half (in the same special case) says that the actual colimit of the diagram of simplicial sets $Sing(C_U)$ is weakly equivalent to $Sing(X)$. $\endgroup$ – Marc Hoyois Nov 23 '14 at 23:03
  • $\begingroup$ My attitude to Seifer-van Kampen thoerems is that they are about direct computation of a strict homotopical invariant as an exact colimit. $\endgroup$ – Ronnie Brown Nov 24 '14 at 15:03
  • $\begingroup$ The invariants I have dealt with are of: spaces with many base points; filtered spaces; and $n$-cubes of spaces. The first two are dealt with in the EMS Tract vol 15 (2011) on "Nonabelian algebraic topology:...", and were published first in 1967 and 1981, respectively. $\endgroup$ – Ronnie Brown Nov 24 '14 at 15:17
8
$\begingroup$

Tammo tom Dieck's book "Algebraic topology" (EMS 2008) has Section 13.2 on the "homotopy colimit of a covering" which you should find relevant.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.