In the proposition mentioned in the title, Hartshorne states that for each $i\geq 0$ the higher direct image sheaf $R^if_*\mathcal F$ is exactly the sheafification of the presheaf given by

$V \mapsto H^i(f^{-1}(V),\mathcal F_{|f^{-1}(V)})$

The proof seems to be quite easy: The statement is obvious for $i=0$ and since the functor defined above is an universal $\delta$-functor, we obtain the result by a well-known theorem in homological algebra.

I tried to come up with the details, but trying to show that the functor defined above admits a long exact sequence, i got stuck at one point:

Given an exact sequence $0 \to \mathcal F' \to \mathcal F \to \mathcal F'' \to 0$ on X, for each open $V \subset Y$ we get an exact sequence $0 \to \mathcal F'_{|f^{-1}(V)} \to \mathcal F_{|f^{-1}(V)} \to \mathcal F''_{|f^{-1}(V)} \to 0$ giving rise to a long exact sequence

$0 \to H^0(f^{-1}(V),\mathcal F'_{|f^{-1}(V)}) \to H^0(f^{-1}(V),\mathcal F_{|f^{-1}(V)}) \to H^0(f^{-1}(V),\mathcal F''_{|f^{-1}(V)}) \to H^1(f^{-1}(V),\mathcal F'_{|f^{-1}(V)}) \to \dotsc$

But for this to induce a long exact sequence of presheaves (which would give me the long exact sequence of sheaves since sheafification is exact), i need the boundary-maps $\delta:H^i(f^{-1}(V),\mathcal F''_{|f^{-1}(V)}) \to H^{i+1}(f^{-1}(V),\mathcal F'_{|f^{-1}(V)})$ to commute with the restriction maps $H^i(f^{-1}(V),\mathcal F_{|f^{-1}(V)}) \to H^i(f^{-1}(W),\mathcal F_{|f^{-1}(W)})$ whenever $W \subset V$ is an inclusion of two opens. But i don't see this.

My questions:

1) How exactly do i get (or how do i have to think about) those restriction maps?

2) How can i make sure the restriction maps commute with the $\delta$-maps?

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Boundary maps are natural transformations of functors; they commute with all induced maps. $\endgroup$ – Alex Degtyarev Nov 20 '14 at 17:50

Let $f: X \to Y$ be a morphism. There is a factorisation $f_*: Sh(X) \to Sh(Y)$: $f_* = (-)^\# \circ f_{p,*}$ with $(-)^\#: PSh(Y) \to Sh(Y)$ exact over $PSh(Y)$ and $\Gamma(f^{-1}(U),-): Sh(X) \to Ab$ factors as $\Gamma(U,-) \circ f_{p,*}$ over $PSh(Y)$ with $\Gamma(U,-): PSh(Y) \to Ab$ exact. It follows that $R^if_* = (R^if_{p,*})^\#$ and $\Gamma(U,R^if_{p,*}) = R^i\Gamma(f^{-1}(U),-)$.


Probably, the easy way to think of your question is the following. Let $f:Y\to X$ be a sufficiently nice morphism. Recall that one can actually work with presheaves on a base of topology $\mathcal{B}$. In particular, let $\mathcal{B}$ consist of affine opens $U\subset X$ and let inclusions be those of principal opens $U_f\subset U$.

Let $U=\mathrm{Spec}\ A$ be an affine open, $Y_U=f^{-1}(U)$. Now, pick an affine covering of $Y_U$ and compute $H^i(Y_U, \mathcal{F})$ by means of the corresponding Cech complex. Each term of the complex is naturally an $A$-module (this is what it means to work over an affine base), cohomologies are $A$-modules, LES's of cohomology are exact sequences of $A$-modules!

Now, figure out yourself what happens when you restrict to $U_f$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.