This is a subsequence of primes $p$ for which $p^2-1$ has at most 6 prime divisors counted with multiplicity.

This sequence described in the question is the sequence A079153 in OEIS.

I could not find references on the first sequence, but I found a mention of the second sequence in another MO question: Number of prime factors of the order of a finite non-abelian simple group with a reference to a survey article by Solomon from 2001: are there infinitely many primes $p$ such that $|PSL(2,p)|=(p-1)*p*(p+1)/2$ is a product of six prime factors? In the survey article it is said this problem is akin to the twin prime conjecture, but no references are given.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The statement that $p^2-1$ has at most 6 prime factors (with multiplicity) is weaker than the statement that both $p-1$ and $p+1$ have most 3 prime factors (with multiplicity). For example, if $p-1$ has 2 prime factors and $p+1$ has 4 prime factors (with multiplicity), then the first statement is true, while the second is false. $\endgroup$
    – GH from MO
    Commented Nov 11, 2014 at 17:38
  • $\begingroup$ just to make sure I understand the previous comment with a specific example, say $p=23$ so then $p-1=22=2*11$ and $p+1=24=2*2*2*3$, thus $p^2-1$ has 6 prime divisors (with multiplicity) while $p-1$ has only 2, and $p+1$ has 4. Is that right (and if so, should then the OP question be clarified)? $\endgroup$
    – Mirko
    Commented Nov 11, 2014 at 18:09
  • $\begingroup$ Both of you are of course quite right. I am editing my question. $\endgroup$
    – wishcow
    Commented Nov 11, 2014 at 18:50
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Dickson's conjecture would imply that there are infinitely many members of the subsequence where, e.g., $(p-1)/6$ and $(p+1)/4$ are prime. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 11, 2014 at 19:37

1 Answer 1


At the present time, the best (general) result is due to James Maynard, who has proven that any admissible 3-tuple takes at most 7 prime factors infinitely often (see this paper). In particular, (using a certain admissible 3-tuple related to what Robert Israel wrote) we can get that $n(n^2-1)$ has at most 11 prime factors infinitely often.

I don't know if this number can be improved for the specific case you are interested in. However, the general consensus is that Dickson's conjecture is true, so both $p-1$ and $p+1$ should consist of exactly 3 prime factors, for infinitely many $p$. But this conjecture is currently out of reach of any known techniques, and appears to be harder than the twin prime conjecture, since we must control admissible 3-tuples, but the twin prime problem deals with only admissible 2-tuples.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The result of James Maynard is much stronger than the twin prime conjecture. $\endgroup$
    – Jovan
    Commented Oct 1, 2020 at 11:50
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ No, it is not. Why do you say it is? $\endgroup$
    – Wojowu
    Commented Oct 1, 2020 at 11:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.