1
$\begingroup$

My goal is to better understand the Maslov-index of pseudoholomorphic disks.

For a symplectic manifold $(M,\omega)$ and a Lagrangian submanifold $L\subset M$, the Maslov-index of a pseudoholomorphic disk with boundary on $L$ is given by a homomorphism $$ \mu:\pi_2(M,L)\to \mathbb{Z}. $$

If $[u]=0\in\pi_2(M,L)$, then the Maslov-index $\mu([u])$ is zero as well.

What can be said about the converse? Are there any special situations in which $[u]=0\in\pi_2(M,L)$ is equivalent to $\mu([u])=0$?

If, for example, $\pi_2(M,L)$ is torsion, then $\mu([u])=0$ for all $[u]\in\pi_2(M,L)$. However, I don't know any explicit example where $\pi_2(M,L)$ is torsion, so I would really like to see such an example.

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

3
$\begingroup$

A holomorphic disc class is quite different from a holomorphic disc, there may not be any holomorphic disc in a disc class. So what you asked in your title is different from what you described below.

I'd like to point out a simple example of a Maslov index 0 holomorphic disc whose class in $\pi_2(X,L)$ is non-trivial.

Consider $X=\mathbb{C}^2\setminus\{xy=1\}$ and the Lagrangian submanifold $L\subset X$ defined by

$L:=\big\{\log|xy-1|=C,|x|=|y|\big\}$

for some fixed constant $C\neq0$. It's clear that $L$ is topologically a torus. Then $L$ bounds a Maslov index 0 holomorphic disc whose class $\beta$ is non-trivial in $\pi_2(X,L)$.

One way to see this is to use the Hamiltonian isotopy between

$L'=\big\{\log|xy-1|=C,|x|>|y|\big\}$

treated as a Lagrangian submanifold in $\mathbb{C}^2$ and a torus fiber $K$ of the standard moment map on $\mathbb{C}^2$. Then we are led to the computation of some Maslov index 2 open Gromov-Witten invariants in some class $\alpha\in\pi_2(\mathbb{C}^2,K)$, which is known to be 1.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for the example, I'll have to think about it some more. $\endgroup$
    – Dave
    Nov 4, 2014 at 20:54
2
$\begingroup$

On the topological level, since $\mu : \pi_2(M,L) \to \mathbb Z$ is a group homomorphism, if it is nontrivial, then you get an exact sequence $$1 \to \ker \mu \to \pi_2(M,L) \to \mathbb Z \to 0$$ and of course there are situations in which $\ker \mu \neq 0$. In fact, if $\mu \neq 0$, then $\ker \mu = 0$ if and only if $\pi_2(M,L) \simeq \mathbb Z$. There are numerous examples with $\pi_2(M,L) \not\simeq \mathbb Z$, for example Clifford tori in $\mathbb{CP}^n$, where $\pi_2(M,L) \simeq \mathbb Z^{n+1}$.

Of course, as YHBKJ pointed out, not every class in $\pi_2(M,L)$ is going to have a holomorphic representative. This depends on the almost complex structure, but beyond that nonzero classes with zero area or classes with negative area will never have such a representative.

To complete the thought, I should add that a Maslov $0$ disk will be trivial in $\pi_2(M,L)$ if and only if it is constant. One direction is trivial. For the other one notice that a nontrivial holomorphic disk must have positive area, therefore it can't represent the trivial class in $\pi_2(M,L)$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.