Affine space structure on the space of Hermitian connections I'm reading Gauduchon's paper Hermitian connections and Dirac operators.
For a fixed almost-Hermitian manifold $(M, g, J)$ let $\mathcal A(g, J)$ be the space of connections $\nabla$ s.t. $\nabla g = \nabla J=0$.
The torsion $T$ of $\nabla$ is seen in the space $\Omega^2(T M)$ of vector-valued 2-forms which in turn is seen as a space of trilinear forms that are skew wrt the last two arguments by the identification $T(X,Y,Z) = g(X, T(Y, Z))$.
At the beginning of section 2 the paper says $A(g, J)$ is an affine space modeled on the space $\Omega^{1,1}(T M) = \{ B \in \Omega^2(T M): B(JX, JY) = B(X,Y) \}$.
For a fixed $\nabla \in \mathcal A(g, J)$ define its potential wrt the Levi Civita as $\nabla_X Y - D_X Y =: A^\nabla(X,Y)$.
Is it that obvious that, given $\nabla_1, \nabla_2 \in \mathcal A(g, J)$ then the difference satisfies
$$
A^{\nabla_1}(JX, JY) - A^{\nabla_2}(JX, JY) = A^{\nabla_1}(X,Y) - A^{\nabla_2}(X,Y) ??
$$
Thanks
David
 A: Let $\nabla^0$ be a connection for which $g$ and $J$ are parallel.
The way Gauduchon is identifying $\mathcal{A}(g,J)$ with $\nabla^0 + \Omega^{1,1}(TM)$ is
by saying that another connection $\nabla$ gives rise to a two form $A^\nabla =\nabla-\nabla^0\in
\Omega^2(TM)$, which he views as a trilinear map 
$X \otimes Y \otimes Z \mapsto g(A^\nabla(X,Y), Z)$.
This map is skew symmetric in the last two variables because both $\nabla$ and
$\nabla^0$ preserve $g$:
$g(\nabla_X Y, Z) = - g(Y, \nabla_X Z) = - g(\nabla_X Z, Y)$. 
So we have an element of $\Omega^2(TM)$. It is in these last two variables
that we want to check that our form is in $\Omega^{1,1}$. We have
$A^\nabla(X,JY) = J A^\nabla (X,Y)$ (since the lack of linearity of $\nabla$ cancels that of $\nabla^0$), and therefore
$g (A^\nabla(X,JY), JZ) = g (J A^\nabla(X,Y), JZ) = g (A^\nabla(X,Y), Z)$, where we used the fact that $J$ was hermitian with respect to $g$. It seems to me that you are trying to use $X, Y$ as the skew parameters of the two form instead. 
