Two questions related to $TS^{2}$ as a holomorphic manifold We consider $TS^{2}$ as  a  2  dimensional holomorphic manifold and fix  an explicit   holomorphic  structure on $TS^{2}$ as it is  indicated in the  answer of  Mike Usher to the following  question. We have two questions which are not  necessarily related to each others(directly).

1)Is there  a  holomorphic  map $q:TS^{2}\to S^{2}$ such that $(TS^{2}, S^{2}, q)$  has an  structure of  a holomorphic line  bundle or at least  topological one  dim. complex line  bundle or two  dim real  vector  bundle?
2) Consider the  natural  projection $p:TS^{2}\to S^{2}$. By  definition, a  holomorphic  vector  field on $S^{2}$ is  a  holomorphic  map $X:S^{2}\to TS^{2}$ with $p\circ X=Id.$ To what extend these holomorphic  vector  fields have  been classified? In  particular what  can  be  said about the nature of  singularities  and  closed orbits  of  a  holomorphic  vector  field? Can we  have  a  singularity  with negative index, ex: saddle point? Can  we  have  a  limit  cycle for  a  holomorphic  vector  field? Is the  space of  holomorphic  vector  field  a  Lie  algebra, that is  closed under the  usual Lie  bracket? 

Note 1: In the  above  questions, $S^{2}$  is  identified with the  one  dim complex  manifold $\mathbb{C}P^{1}$  
Note 2: The  second  question is  weakly  motivated  by the  following  facts: Let $F:U\to \mathbb{C}$ be  a  holomorphic  map  where $U\subset \mathbb{C}$ is  an  open subset. Then the  index of  each singular  point of the vector  field $\dot x=F(x)$ is non negative. Moreover such vector  fields have    no  limit  cycle, because $[F,iF]=0$ on the other hand every two  commuting  flows share on limit  cycles, that is  every  limit  cycles of one is  invariant under the other ones.  The other reason that $\dot x= F(x)$ has no limit cycle is that for each $t$ the flow $\phi_{t}$ is  a  holomorphic map Now put $T=\text{the period of  limit cycle}$. So $\phi_{T}$ as  a holomorphic  maps has  a curve of  fixed points. this  implies that $\phi_{T}$ is  identicaly equal to the identity map. So  a  closed orbit lies  in a band of  closed orbit with the same  period. so there is  no  an isolated closed orbit, i.e. limit cycle.
 A: This discussion seems to involve two holomorphic structures on the smooth manifold $T S^2$.
Structure 1 Identify $S^2$ with $\mathbb{CP}^1$. Place a complex structure on the real tangent bundle to $\mathbb{CP}^1$ by using the complex structure on $\mathbb{CP}^1$. This is the structure Alex Degtyarev's answer refers to. As Alex says, this is the line bundle $\mathcal{O}(2)$ and has a three dimensional vector space of holomorphic sections. If we write $z$ for a coordinate on $\mathbb{CP}^1$, they are $\frac{\partial}{\partial z}$, $z \frac{\partial}{\partial z}$ and $z^2 \frac{\partial}{\partial z}$. They form a Lie algebra isomorphic to $\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb{C})$. You can see this by direct computation, but a better method is to notice that they are the infinitesimal version of the $SL_2(\mathbb{C})$ action on $\mathbb{CP}^1$. This, the orbit structure is described by one parameter subgroups of $SL_2(\mathbb{C})$ and should come down to some computations with Jordan form.
Structure 2 As in your previous question, identify $TS^2$ with $\{ (x,y,z) \in \mathbb{C}^3 : x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 1 \}$. This can't be the same as structure $1$ because $\mathbb{CP}^1$ doesn't embed holomorphically into $\mathbb{C}^3$, so there is no place for the zero section to land. Let's call this complex manifold $X$.
There is a holomorphic map $X \to \mathbb{CP}^1$, sending $(x,y,z)$ to whichever of $(x+iy:1-z)$ and $(1+z:x-iy)$ is well defined. (If both are well defined then the equation $(x+iy)(x-iy) = (1+z)(1-z)$ shows they are equal.) This is an affine bundle, meaning that the fibers are $\mathbb{C}$'s and the transition maps are in $\mathbb{C}^{\times} \ltimes \mathbb{C}$. But it doesn't have any sections at all, since $\mathbb{CP}^1$ doesn't embed in $\mathbb{C}^3$, so it isn't a line bundle.
Moreover, you can turn an affine bundle into a line bundle by applying the quotient map $\mathbb{C}^{\times} \ltimes \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C}^{\times}$ to the transition functions. (The resulting line bundle is diffeomorphic to the original affine bundle, since all affine bundles have sections in the smooth category.) But I get that the result is $\mathcal{O}(-2) \cong T^{\ast} S^2$, not $T S^2$. Of course, those are the same as smooth manifolds, but they are different as holomorphic manifolds. (As symplectic manifolds, I don't know.)
A: $TS^2\to S^2$ has Euler class $2$; ergo, the line bundle in question is $\mathcal{O}_{\Bbb P^1}(2)$. It's holomorphic sections form a vector space of dimension $3$; they can be thought of as degree $\le2$ polynomials on $\Bbb C$.
Added in proof: All this is independent of the holomorphic structure on $TS^2$ assuming that there is a fibration $TS^2\to S^2$. Indeed, over $\Bbb P^1$, a line bundle is determined by its $\text{degree}=c_1=e$ (Euler class), and the latter is the self-intersection of the zero section, which, in turn, is the generator of $H_2(TS^2)=\Bbb Z$. So, everything is in the topology of the oriented manifold $TS^2$.
