MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Given a group $G$ we may consider its group ring $\mathbb C[G]$ consisting of all finitely supported functions $f\colon G\to\mathbb C$ with pointwise addition and convolution. Take $f,g\in\mathbb C[G]$ such that $f*g=1$. Does this imply that $g*f=1$?

If $G$ is abelian, its group ring is commutative, so the assertion holds. In the non-abelian case we have $f*g(x)=\sum_y f(xy^{-1})g(y)$, while $g*f(x)=\sum_y f(y^{-1}x)g(y)$, and this doesn't seem very helpful.

If $G$ is finite, $\dim_{\mathbb C} \mathbb C[G]= |G|<\infty$, and we may consider a linear operator $T\colon \mathbb C[G]\to\mathbb C[G]$ defined by $T(h) = f*h$. It is obviously surjective, and hence also injective. Now, the assertion follows from $T(g*f)=f=T(1)$.

What about infinite non-abelian groups? Is a general proof or a counterexample known?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 21 down vote accepted

A ring is called Dedekind-finite if that property holds. Semisimple rings are Dedekind finite, so this covers $\mathbb CG$ for a finite group $G$; this is easy to do by hand. It is a theorem of Kaplansky that this also holds $KG$ for arbitrary groups $G$ and arbitrary fields $K$ of characteristic zero. See [Kaplansky, Irving. Fields and rings. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.-London 1969 ix+198 pp. MR0269449] It is open, I think, for general fields.

share|cite|improve this answer
"...if $R$ is an Artinian ring and $G$ is a sofic group, then the group ring $R[G]$ is stably finite..." -MR2362939 (2009a:16046) Ceccherini-Silberstein, Tullio(I-SAN-EN); Coornaert, Michel(F-STRAS-I) Linear cellular automata over modules of finite length and stable finiteness of group rings. J. Algebra 317 (2007), no. 2, 743--758. See also MR2335561 (2008j:16077) Nasrutdinov, M. F.(RS-KAZA) Stable finiteness of group rings. (Russian) Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Mat. 2006, , no. 11, 29--32; translation in Russian Math. (Iz. VUZ) 50 (2006), no. 11, 27--30 (2007) – Jonas Meyer Mar 17 '10 at 18:42
It is worth noting that (AFAIK) there is no group which is known to be non-sofic. Also, in more or less the same breath, Kaplansky observes that the group von Neumann algebra of a discrete group, like any finite von Neumann algebra, is Dedekind finite (also sometimes called directly finite). A slightly lower tech proof can be extracted from M. S. Montgomery, Left and right inverses in group algebras, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 75 (1969) 539--540. (Might also shamelessly plug while I'm typing...) – Yemon Choi Mar 17 '10 at 20:16
One should add that the result for sofic groups was first shown by Elek and Szabo in "Sofic groups and direct finiteness", Journal of Algebra Vol 280, Issue 2 – Łukasz Grabowski Jun 15 '11 at 11:50

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.