Let $\Sigma_k$ be the permutation group of order $k$.

Let $r: \Sigma_k\to GL(k)$ be the regular representation by permuting the order of the standard basis of $\mathbb{R}^n$.

Let $\rho: B\Sigma_k\to BGL(k)=G_k(\mathbb{R}^\infty)$ be the induced map (induced from $r$) between classifying spaces.

Let $\rho^*: H^*(G_k(\mathbb{R}^\infty))\to H^*(B\Sigma_k)$ be the induced homomorphism of cohomology with coefficients in $\mathbb{Z}_2$.

What is the image $\text{Im} \rho^*$?

  • $\begingroup$ This paper by Pierre Guillot contains relevant information. $\endgroup$ – few_reps Oct 20 '14 at 11:19
  • $\begingroup$ @few_reps Guillot considers the subring generated by all real representations, whereas the original post is concerned with the subring generated by one particular representation. $\endgroup$ – user43326 Oct 20 '14 at 16:03

I suppose by $\mathbb{Z}_2$ you mean $\mathbb{Z}/2$ and not $\mathbb{Z}^{\wedge}_2$. Then we have $$H^*(BO(k);\mathbb{Z}/2)\cong \mathbb{Z}/2[w_1,w_2\cdots w_k].$$ By definition we have $\rho ^*(w_n)=w_n(r)$ where $w_n(r)$ is the $n$-th Stiefel-Whiteney class of the representation $r$. Since the regular representation factors through $O(k-1)$, we see that $w_k=0$. We can, in theory, determine the image using the fact that the Quillen's map is injective (as a matter of fact, isomorphic) for the symmetric groups, that is elements of mod $2$ cohomology of the symmetric get detected by its elementary abelian subgroups.

In the case of $k=4$, for example, if we call $V_1=\{(12),(34),(12)(34),id\},V_2=\{(12)(34),(13)(24),(14)(23),id\}$ then the restriction of $w_n(r)$'s to $BV_1$ can be computed using Whitney product formula, and the restriction to $BV_2$ can be found more or less using the definition of Dickson invariants, so by comaparing with the table in http://homepages.math.uic.edu/~bshipley/ConMcohomology1.pdf Example 4.4, we see that they coincide with standard generators of $H^*(B\Sigma _4;\mathbb{Z}/2)$. Thus for $k=4$ $\rho ^*$ is surjective. In principle, this kind of analysis can be carried out for larger $k$, but I am not aware of any explicit result.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.