Let $H$ be a subgroup of $G$. Let $\rho$ be an irr representation of $G$ induced from an irr representation $\theta$ of $H$. It is well known that $\rho$ is monomial if $\theta$ is monomial. Is it possible that $\rho$ is monomial but $\theta$ is not monomial?

In other words, can monomial representations induced from nonmonomial representations?


According to Djokovic and Maizan, the Specht module $V_{(3, 1, 1)}$ of $S_5$ is monomial. This is a representation of dimension $6$, induced from a representation of dimension $3$ of $A_5$. Since $A_5$ has no subgroup of index $3$ (see here for example), this representation of $A_5$ cannot be monomial.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for providing this nice example. Is there a general theory behind such phenomena? $\endgroup$ – Huangjun Zhu Oct 14 '14 at 15:33
  • $\begingroup$ None that I know of (besides Geoff's answer alongside this one). $\endgroup$ – Amritanshu Prasad Oct 15 '14 at 3:42

As Amritanshu Prasad points out, the $6$-dimensional irreducible complex representation of $S_{5}$ is indeed monomial (with respect to a suitable basis), and thinking about how to prove this directly led me to a general observation: let $G$ be a finite group, and $\chi$ be a non-linear complex irreducible character of $G$ of minimal degree. Let $H$ be a proper subgroup of $G$ of index less than $2\chi(1).$ Let $\lambda$ be a linear character of $H$ of order $m$ ( that is, $\lambda^{m}$ is the trivial character, but no smaller positive integer power of $\lambda$ is trivial). Then if $m$ does not divide $[G:G^{\prime}],$ the induced character $\theta = {\rm Ind}_{H}^{G}(\lambda)$ is irreducible. For otherwise, (by Frobenius reciprocity), there must be a linear constituent $\mu$ of $\theta$ such that $\langle {\rm Res}^{G}_{H}(\mu),\lambda \rangle \neq 0.$ But then the order of $\mu$ must be divisible by $m,$ whereas the order of $\mu$ divides $[G:G^{\prime}],$ a contradiction.

To apply this result to $G = S_{5},$ take $H$ to be the normalizer of a Sylow $5$-subgroup. Then $[G:G^{\prime}] = 2,$ and $H$ has a linear character $\lambda$ of order $4,$ so the above result can be used to see that ${\rm Ind}_{H}^{G}(\lambda)$ is irreducible (for note that $S_{5}$ has no non-linear irreducible character of degree less than $4$).

Incidentally, taking $G = A_{5},$ and $K$ to be a Sylow $5$-normalizer of $G$, we see that $[G:G^{\prime}] = 1,$ that $[G:K] = 6$ and that $G$ has no non-linear irreducible character of degree less than $3.$ However, $K$ has a linear character of order $2$ such that ${\rm Ind}_{K}^{G}(\lambda)$ is not irreducible ( it is a sum of two irreducible characters of degree $3$). Hence the bound $[G:H] < 2 \chi(1)$ in the result above can't be sharpened in general.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.