4
$\begingroup$

I've always been surprised by the fact that $(Epi, Mono)$ is, when possible, a strong factorization system (unique solution to lifting problems, existence of unique factorization), whereas $(Mono, Epi)$ is only a weak factorization system. How can one tell when something similar happen in general? Is there any other known example of such a situation?

PS: I know that orthogonality (which is the thing I'm focused on in my question) is not enough to define a factorization system, weak or not. If you think the question is more amenable replacing factorizations with prefactorizations, feel free to consider the problem of determining when $\mathcal E\perp \mathcal M$ (strong) and $\mathcal M\pitchfork\mathcal E $ (weak).

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Please would you say what you mean by strong and weak. I am not sure that I have heard such terminology before for factorisation systems. Besides, these words are grossly over-used in mathematics. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 9, 2014 at 21:53
  • $\begingroup$ I added links to the Joyal catlab with the definitions. $\endgroup$
    – fosco
    Commented Oct 9, 2014 at 22:08

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .