Let $S_n=\{\text{bijections }[n]\to[n]\}$ be the n-th symmetric group. Its (co)homology will be understood with trivial action. What are the $\mathbb{Z}$-modules $H_k(S_n;\mathbb{Z})$? Using GAP, we calculate this for small $n$ and $k$: enter image description here This seems to be an infinite amount of data with no apparent patterns, just the stabilization for $n\geq2k$.

In Stable homology of automorphism groups of free groups (Galatius - 2008) p.2 there is written: "The homology groups $H_k(S_n)$ are completely known" referring to Nakaoka's articles Decomposition Theorem for Homology Groups of Symmetric Groups, Homology of the Infinite Symmetric Group, Note on cohomology algebras of symmetric groups from 1960, 1961, 1962. I haven't found any such table in those articles, or in Cohomology of Finite Groups (Adem, Milgram - 1994). My questions are:

1) Does $H_k(S_n;\mathbb{Q})$ and $H_k(S_n;\mathbb{Z}_p)$ for all prime $p$ determine $H_k(S_n;\mathbb{Z})$?

2) How does the above table look for larger n and k, e.g. what is $H_k(S_{2k};\mathbb{Z})$ for $k=1,...,30$?

3) Is for every prime $p$ and $k\geq1$ the module $\mathbb{Z}_{p^k}$ a direct summand of some $H_k(S_n;\mathbb{Z})$?

4) Does $H_k(S_n;R)\cong H_k(S_{2k};R)$ as $R$-modules for $n>2k$ hold over any ring $R$?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ On cohomology, the depth of torsion seems to be tied to a transfer product, and a corresponding divided powers structure on it, which along with cup product give a Hopf ring structure which sheds considerable light on multiplicative and Steenrod structure. (See my and Guerra's papers on cohomology of symmetric groups.) I haven't worked this out and written it up, but I can share the idea easily enough if you'd like to e-mail me. Guerra, Salvatore and I are writing up the divided powers part of the story as part of studying DX and CX now. $\endgroup$
    – Dev Sinha
    Nov 6 '18 at 19:35

The paradoxical answer is that it is annoying but straightforward to determine $H_k(S_n)$ for particular values of $k$ and $n$, but it is very easy to write down $H_*(\coprod BS_n)$, encompassing all $k$ and all $n$ at once. More generally, if $C$ is the monad on based spaces $X$ determined by any $E_{\infty}$ operad $\mathcal C$, then the Hopf algebra $H_*(CX;\mathbb F_p)$ is an explicitly known functor of the coalgebra $H_*(X;\mathbb F_p)$. Moreover the Bockstein spectral sequence of $CX$ for any prime $p$ is functorially determined by that of $X$, so in principal the integral homology of $CX$ is explicitly determined by the integral homology of $X$. When $X= S^0$, $CX$ is the disjoint union of the classifying spaces $BS_n$, so the homology of all symmetric groups is there as a special case, connected together by multiplicative structure determined by the the evident homomorphisms $S_m\times S_n \longrightarrow S_{m+n}$. User43326 gives a reference for all of this. The answer to 1) and 3) is yes, the answer to 2) is that it is boring but implicit how to write down a table such as yours for small values of $n$ and $k$, it is just not especially interesting to do so, or so it seems to me. It can be left as an exercise to check whether or not 4) is true.

  • $\begingroup$ Could you please elaborate on "straightforward to determine $H_k(S_n)$"? Is there a combinatorial description? Also, where can one find the proof of 3)? $\endgroup$
    – Leo
    Sep 11 '14 at 22:54
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ If you have a polynomial algebra on a specified set of generators in specified degrees, finitely many in each degree, then you can enumerate. Mod p, that kind of enumeration is immediate from the functor I alluded to. The proof of 3) is in the description of the Bockstein spectral sequences I alluded to, pages 48-49 opus cit. $\endgroup$
    – Peter May
    Sep 12 '14 at 0:45
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ $H_*(CS^0;Z/p)$ is a polynomial algebra with generators $Q^I(i_0)$'s where $Q^I$'s are allowable Dyer-Lashof operations. Assign weight $p^l(I)$ where $l(I)$ is the length of $I$ to the element $Q^I(i_0)$. Then monominals of weight $n$ form a basis of $H_*(\Sigma _n;Z/p)$. $\endgroup$
    – user43326
    Sep 12 '14 at 6:58
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ User 43326, that is not quite right for odd p. You forgot the bocksteins in the DL operations, which give you odd degree generators, so you have a polynomial algebra on even degree generators tensored with an exterior algebra on odd degree generators. Change polynomial algebra to free (graded) commutative algebra and the statement is correct. $\endgroup$
    – Peter May
    Sep 12 '14 at 13:24
  • $\begingroup$ a related question and some possible corrections: mathoverflow.net/questions/297319 $\endgroup$
    – wonderich
    Apr 8 '18 at 17:33

The answer to the question 1) is "yes". The classifying space of the symmetric group is of finite type, so its integral homology is determined by its rational homology and $p$-local homology for all $p$'s. Now, mod $p$ homology doesn't really determine the $p$-local homology, but we know completely the bockstein spectral sequence (see http://www.math.uchicago.edu/~may/BOOKS/homo_iter.pdf Chapter 1, Theorem 4.13, so we can get the $p$-local homology. Furthermore, since the symmetric group is finite, its rational homology is trivial.

The answer to the question 4) is also yes (and this time, it is a real yes), and a good reference is http://www.math.uchicago.edu/~may/BOOKS/homo_iter.pdf You can read off mod $p$ homology of $\Sigma _n$ from that of $CS^0$, and this is treated in chapter 1, section 5.

Hopefully you can find the answers to other questions in the references above.


Here are some comments, including an answer to (3). Firstly, if you want an actual explicit computation of the mod-2 cohomology of symmetric groups $S_n$ for as large an $n$ as possible, you should look at M. Feshbach's `The mod-2 cohomology rings of the symmetric groups and invariants' Topology volume 41 (2002) 57-84. This contains explicit computations of the cohomology rings $H^*(S_n;\mathbb{F}_2)$ for $n\leq 16$, including correcting a minor error in a calculation in the book of A Adem and J Milgram.

The advantage of cohomology is that it is a ring, also that the cohomology of a finite group with coefficients in either $\mathbb{Z}$ or a field is a finitely presented algebra over the coefficients.

Here is a non-constructive solution to (3). By the universal coefficient theorem, it suffices to show the same thing for cohomology. Now let $n$ be sufficiently large that the symmetric group $S_n$ contains a cyclic subgroup of order $p^k$; of course the least such $n$ is $n=p^k$. For any such $n$, there will be elements of order $p^k$ in $H^j(S_n;\mathbb{Z})$ for infinitely many values of $j$. To see this one uses the Evens-Venkov theorem.

For any finite group $G$ and any subgroup $H$, the map from $H^*(G;\mathbb{Z})$ to $H^*(H;\mathbb{Z})$ makes the ring $H^*(H;\mathbb{Z})$ into a module for the ring $H^*(G;\mathbb{Z})$. The Evens-Venkov theorem tells us that $H^*(H;\mathbb{Z})$ is finitely generated as an $H^*(G;\mathbb{Z})$-module.

Now to apply this. The cohomology ring of the cyclic group of order $p^k$ is isomorphic to a polynomial ring $\mathbb{Z}[c]/(p^kc)$, where $c$ is a generator for $H^2$. If $R$ is a (graded) subring of this ring such that the whole ring is a finitely generated $R$-module, then $R$ contains $c^m$ for some $m$, and hence $H^{2mj}(S_n;\mathbb{Z})$ contains an element of order $p^k$ for every $j$. The universal coefficient theorem then tells you that $H_{2mj-1}(S_n;\mathbb{Z})$ contains an element of order $p^k$ for all $j$.

You asked about summands of order exactly $p^k$. In fact, $H^*(S_n;\mathbb{Z})$ will contain these whenever $n\geq p^k$, although I can't provide a quick argument. A quicker thing to see is that for $p^k \leq n < p^{k+1}$, the exponent of the $p$-local cohomology of $S_n$ is exactly $p^k$. I'll give the argument just for $n=p^k$. There is a subgroup of $S_{p^k}$ isomorphic to the direct product of $p$ copies of $S_{p^{k-1}}$. Furthermore, the index of this subgroup is divisible by $p$ but not divisible by $p^2$.

For any finite group $G$ and subgroup $H$, there is a transfer map in cohomology $H^*(H;\mathbb{Z})\rightarrow H^*(G;\mathbb{Z})$ with the property that the composite map from $H^*(G;\mathbb{Z})$ to itself given by first mapping to $H^*(H;\mathbb{Z})$ and then transferring back up is equal to multiplication by the index $|G:H|$.

Going back to the symmetric group, we know by induction on $k$ that the exponent of the $p$-part of $H^*(S_{p^{k-1}};\mathbb{Z})$ is $p^{k-1}$, and by the Kunneth formula the same holds true for the direct product of $p$ copies of this group. The restriction from $S_{p^k}$ down to this subgroup, followed by the transfer map back up is, up to units, multiplication by $p$ on the $p$-local cohomology $H^*(S_{p^k};\mathbb{Z}_{(p)})$. Hence the exponent of this group is at most $p^k$. Combined with the Evens-Venkov lower bound this gives the claim.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.