9
$\begingroup$

Because addition and multiplication of two order types are non-commutative operations, we have that for every integer n, given n ordinals, there are at most n! distinct possible values for the sum (or the product) of these n ordinals when all permutations are considered. In fact, A. Wakulic (Fund. Math., XXXVI, pp 255-260) was able to establish the effective function F(n) giving the maximal possible number of distinct values for the SUM of n ordinals, when considering all permutations. QUESTION: What is the effective function G(n) giving the maximal possible number of distinct values for the PRODUCT of n ordinals, when considering all permutations ? Gérard Lang

$\endgroup$
2
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ To save other people hunting, Wakulicz paper is matwbn.icm.edu.pl/ksiazki/fm/fm36/fm36126.pdf . The answer for addition (once $n > 20$) is $81^t 193^r$ where $n-1 = 5t+6r$ and $0 \leq r \leq 4$. This is of size roughly $81^{n/5} \approx 2.41^n$, beating the value $2^{n-1}$ obtained by using $\omega$, $\omega^2$, $\omega^3$, ..., $\omega^n$. I have not yet understood Wakulicz's proof. $\endgroup$ Aug 27, 2014 at 14:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The paper of Wakulicz (pages 255-266) is written in french. The formula valid for n>20 is obtained by writing all ordinals in their Cantor normal form (as a pseudo-polynomial of powers of ω) and analyzing very precisely the consequences of the fact that every term with a power of ω written at the left of another term with a strictly greater power of ω can be eliminated of the sum. So that I do not think that this method can be used in the case of the product. Gérard Lang $\endgroup$ Aug 27, 2014 at 22:46

2 Answers 2

13
$\begingroup$

Simply take the ordinals $\omega+1,...,\omega+n$ and one obtains $n!$ distinct products (This solution was taken from Chapter 8 Problem 39 and Chapter 9 Problem 66 in the book Problems and Theorems is Classical Set Theory).

This follows from the easily provable fact that for natural numbers $r_{1},...,r_{n}$ we have $$(\omega+r_{1})\cdots(\omega+r_{n})=\omega^{n}+\omega^{n-1}r_{n}+\omega^{n-2}r_{n-1}+...+\omega r_{2}+r_{1}.$$

$\endgroup$
4
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Here's a link to a paper of Erdos where he says (page 128) that this remark is due to Spanier: renyi.hu/~p_erdos/1950-13.pdf $\endgroup$
    – Ashutosh
    Aug 28, 2014 at 15:06
  • $\begingroup$ Great! This is very clear. $\endgroup$ Aug 28, 2014 at 16:03
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Erdos's paper also contains a proof of Wakulicz's result. They appeared within a year of each other (Wakulicz first), and neither mentions the other, so presumably independent discovery. Those who prefer English to French, or prefer a quick exposition of the key steps to a long detailed exposition, will probably prefer Erdos's version. $\endgroup$ Aug 28, 2014 at 18:07
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ In fact, Erdôs remarked a slight mistake in Wakulicz's paper, and as this remark was published as a correction of Wakulicz's paper by Erdôs in Fund Math XXXVIII, so that certainly Erdôs knew Wakulicz,s result. Gérard Lang $\endgroup$ Aug 29, 2014 at 16:26
9
$\begingroup$

For a lower-bound partial answer, note that there are at least as many ways to form a product as a sum, and so $F(n)\leq G(n)$. This is because we may replace an ordinal $\alpha$ with $\omega^\alpha$ and thereby turn multiplication into addition via $\omega^\alpha\cdot\omega^\beta=\omega^{\alpha+\beta}$. Since $\omega^\alpha=\omega^\xi$ just in case $\alpha=\xi$, this means that the ordinals $\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_n$ have exactly the same number of permuted sums as the ordinals $\omega^{\alpha_1},\ldots,\omega^{\alpha_n}$ have permuted products.

Perhaps the functions for addition and multiplication are simply the same function? I don't see quite yet whether one can get more products by using ordinals not of the form $\omega^\alpha$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.