0
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ be a complex algebraic variety. Its Hilbert scheme represents the functor $G$ from schemes to sets given by $$G(S)=\{Z\subset X\times S|\, Z \mbox{ is a closed subscheme, flat and proper over } S\}.$$

Consider the scheme $\mathcal{F}^X$ which parameterizes pairs: closed proper subscheme of $X$ and a point on it. More precisely, $\mathcal{F}^X$ represents the functor $H$ from schemes to sets $$H(S)=\{Z\subset X\times S \mbox{ is as above }, f\colon S\to Z \mbox{ is a section of the projection } Z\to S\}.$$

I was told in another post Basic questions on the Hilbert scheme/ Douady space the following facts:

1) $\mathcal{F}^X$ does exits.

2) We have the obvious morphisms $\mathcal{F}^X\to X$, $\mathcal{F}^X\to Hilb(X)$ by forgetting either subvariety of a point on it. Then the morphism $$\mathcal{F}^X\to X\times Hilb(X)$$ is a closed imbedding.

Let now $Y\subset X$ be a closed subscheme. I was told in the same above mentioned post that $Hilb(Y)$ is a closed subscheme of $Hilb(X)$. Thus we have three pairs of closed subschemes $$\mathcal{F}^X\subset X\times Hilb(X),$$ $$\mathcal{F}^Y\subset Y\times Hilb(Y)\subset X\times Hilb(X).$$

Question. Is it true that $$\mathcal{F}^Y=\mathcal{F}^X\times_{(X\times Hilb(X))} (Y\times Hilb(Y))?$$

I am particularly interested in a modification of this question when $X$ is a complex analytic (rather than algebraic) scheme; in that case an analogue of Hilbert scheme is called Douady space.

A reference would be very helpful.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

This is true. The condition defining $F^X$ in $X\times Hilb(X)$ is the vanishing of the morphism $I_{Z,X} \subset O_X \to O_x$ (where $Z$ is a subscheme and $x$ is a point). It follows that the fiber product embedds into $Y \times Hilb(Y)$ and is given there by the vanishing of the above morphism. It remains to note that for $(x,Z) \in Y \times Hilb(Y)$ the above composition factors as $$ I_{Z,X} \to I_{Z,Y} \to O_Y \to O_y, $$ where the first map is the restiction to $Y$. This first map is surjective, so the composition vanishes if and only if the composition $I_{Z,Y} \to O_Y \to O_y$ does, which is precisely the property defining $F^Y$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.