The continued fraction $$[1;1,2,3,4,5,\dots]=1+\cfrac{1}{1+\cfrac{1}{2+\cdots}}, $$ for instance, is known explicitly as a ratio of Bessel function values and is (I believe  SS) known to be transcendental. Similarly, $[1,2,2^2,2^3,2^4,2^5,\dots] $ is surely transcendental (and likely related to Liouville numbers). Are there any explicitly known algebraic numbers with unbounded continued fraction coefficients? (Of course, such a number must have degree greater than $2$, by all the usual theorems on continued fraction representations of quadratics.) Any references would be greatly appreciated.

2$\begingroup$ XL: I've revised the question substantially; in particular, the bits about 'computable' unbounded coefficients are rather out of place; CF coefficients for any algebraic number are certainly computable (there are known algorithms) but they're also largely 'patternless' so far as anyone knows (again, at least for degree $\gt 2$). AFAIK even the simpler question of unboundedness is open, and as that's the most central question here I've revised your Q to be about that specifically. $\endgroup$– Steven StadnickiCommented Jul 31, 2014 at 0:57

4$\begingroup$ To the best of my knowledge, there is no algebraic number known to have unbounded partial quotients, and there is no algebraic number of degree exceeding 2 known to have bounded partial quotients. $\endgroup$– Gerry MyersonCommented Jul 31, 2014 at 2:36

3$\begingroup$ I think you'll find, XL, that you can only notify one person per comment. The second @ is ignored. And, yes, everyone believes $\root3\of2$ has unbounded partial quotients, and if it were easy to prove it, it would have been done long ago. But some things that are "certainly true" are highly resistant to proof. $\endgroup$– Gerry MyersonCommented Jul 31, 2014 at 5:33

3$\begingroup$ Another example of nonalgebraic number is $\sqrt{e}$ which has a particular nice CF. The numbers you get are 1, 1, 1, 1, 5, 1, 1, 9, 1, 1, 13, 1, 1, 17, 1, 1, 21, 1, 1, 25, 1, 1, 29, 1, 1, 33, 1, 1, 37, 1, 1, 41, 1, 1, 45, 1, 1, 49, 1, 1 ... $\endgroup$– Per AlexanderssonCommented Jul 31, 2014 at 10:29

2$\begingroup$ @StevenStadnicki: I am hardly Hardy! $\endgroup$– GH from MOCommented Jul 31, 2014 at 19:39
3 Answers
As you indicate, real algebraic numbers of degree $\leq 2$ have this property in view of Lagrange's classical result characterizing them by the eventual periodicicty of the continued fractions expansion. It may be useful to know (if you don't already) that $\alpha \in \mathbb{R}$ having bounded continued fractions coefficients is equivalent to the sharpness of Dirichlet's approximation theorem: $\alpha  p/q > cq^{2}$ for all but finitely many $p/q \in \mathbb{Q}$.
For algebraic numbers this means that the exponent $2+\varepsilon$ in Roth's theorem can be reduced to $2$. For quadratic irrationalities this holds with the uniform constant $c = 1/\sqrt{5}  \epsilon$; google "Lagrange spectrum." As far as I know it is widely believed that this may not happen for any algebraic number of degree $> 2$, although Serge Lang has suggested that a milder improvement in Roth's theorem, whereby $q^{2+\varepsilon}$ gets replaced with $(q\log{q})^2$, is always possible. (This is wide open; there is an analogous statement known to hold true in Nevanlinna theory). Certainly no algebraic number of degree $> 2$ is known to have unbounded partial fractions coefficients, but worse, it does not appear to be even known that there exists an algebraic number having this property.
A reference where this appears explicitly in print is p. 366 of Hindry and Silverman's Diophantine Geometry: An Introduction.
Added. There is also a rather interesting variant of this question for $\mathbb{Z}[i]$continued fractions expansions of complex algebraic numbers.
As is typical in diophantine analysis, both Roth's theorem and the continued fractions algorithm extend to the relative setting over number fields other than $\mathbb{Q}$; and to a large extent, so does the relationship between the two. To be concrete, consider rational approximations over the Gaussian field $\mathbb{Q}(i)$. The relative Roth theorem over $\mathbb{Q}(i)$ states: If $\alpha \in \mathbb{C}$ is algebraic, then for every $\varepsilon > 0$ there are only finitely many pairs $p,q \in \mathbb{Z}[i]$ in the Gaussian lattice satisfying $\alpha  p/q < q^{2\varepsilon}$. [For the general statement over any number field see Thm. 6.2.3 of Bombieri and Gubler's Heights in Diophantine Geometry.]
Likewise, Hurwitz has attached to a complex number a canonical continued fractions expansion with entries in $\mathbb{Z}[i]$, by using the same algorithm as over $\mathbb{Q}$, but with the nearest rounding to the Gaussian lattice $\mathbb{Z}[i]$ (whereas over $\mathbb{Q}$ the conventional choice of rounding involves the floor function $\lfloor \cdot \rfloor$ instead of the nearest rounding to $\mathbb{Z}$). The trichotomy "rationalquadratichigher degree" would appear to extend to the relative setting over this (or any other) number field $\mathbb{Q}(i)$: the $\alpha \in \mathbb{C}$ with terminating expansion are of course precisely the numbers in $\mathbb{Q}(i)$, and Hurwitz has shown that his expansion is eventually periodic if and only if $[\mathbb{Q}(\alpha,i):\mathbb{Q}(i)] \leq 2$.
We can ask, then, the same questions for Hurwitz's complex continued fractions. Rather suprisingly, there are algebraic numbers whose $\mathbb{Z}[i]$continued fractions expansion has bounded coefficients, and whose relative degree over $\mathbb{Q}(i)$ is $> 2$! One such number, due to D. Hensley [1, Ch. 5] in 2006, is $\sqrt{2} + i\sqrt{5}$, of relative degree four. More generally, W. Bosma and D. Gruenewald [3] have shown that a complex number has this property if the square of its modulus is a rational integer which is not a norm from $\mathbb{Z}[i]$; algebraic such examples thus include $\sqrt[m]{2} + i\sqrt{n  \sqrt[m]{4}}$ for all $n \equiv 3 \mod{4}$ and $m$.
(On the other hand, to my knowledge no particular algebraic number has been proven to have unbounded coefficients in its Hurwitz $\mathbb{Z}[i]$continued fractions expansion.)
But now there is something even more curious about the implication of such examples for Roth's theorem over $\mathbb{Q}(i)$ (diophantine approximations by Gaussian numbers). I realize this just now after looking up Hensley's very interesting paper [2] (from 2006), and I wonder why this point isn't brought up in the literature on complex continued fractions.
While the convergents $p_n/q_n \in \mathbb{Q}(i)$ in Hurwitz's expansion no longer exhaust all good $\mathbb{Q}(i)$rational approximations to $\alpha \in \mathbb{C}$ (as they do in the case over $\mathbb{Q}$), Theorem 1 in [2] shows that up to a multiplicative constant, they still give the best $\mathbb{Q}(i)$rational approximations. As a result, for those numbers (algebraic of arbitrarily high relative degree over $\mathbb{Q}(i)$), the exponent $2+\varepsilon$ in Roth's theorem rel. $\mathbb{Q}(i)$ (stated above) can be reduced to $2$, and this is moreover effective:
Consequence: If $\alpha \in \mathbb{C}$ has $\alpha^2 \in \mathbb{Q}$ a rational number not a norm from $\mathbb{Q}(i)$ [e.g., the rel. degreefour algebraic example $\sqrt{2} + i\sqrt{5}$], then there is an effective $c(\alpha) > 0$ such that $\alpha  \beta > cH(\beta)^{2}$ for all $\beta \in \mathbb{Q}(i)$. (Here, $H(\cdot)$ is the absolute multiplicative height on $\bar{\mathbb{Q}}$; for rational or imaginary quadratic integers $n$, it coincides with $n$)
Consider now Khintchine's principle according to which an algebraic number of degree $> 2$ should be generic. As almost every complex number $x \in \mathbb{C}$ has infinitely many $\mathbb{Q}(i)$rational approximants $\beta \in \mathbb{Q}(i)$ with $x  \beta < 1/(H(\beta)^2\log{H(\beta)})$, the numbers $\alpha$ of the above form are not generic in this sense. As they contain algebraic numbers of arbitrarily high (though necessarily even) rel. degree over $\mathbb{Q}(i)$, Khintchine's principle would appear to fail in the relative setting over $\mathbb{Q}(i)$!
Nevertheless I think that the story is more interesting, as the above examples still resemble quadratic irrationalities in some vague sense. Perhaps, in the relative setting of diophantine approximations over a number field $K$, we could salvage Khintchine's principle and the above trichotomy by enlarging the class of special algebraic numbers  which a priori contain all numbers of rel. degree $\leq 2$ over $K$.
Allow me to record a few
Problems. Might the numbers of degree $\leq 2$ over $\mathbb{Q}(i)$ (whose Hurwitz expansions are eventually periodic) and the algebraic numbers mentioned in the above "Consequence" (whose Hurwitz expansions are aperiodic yet have bounded coefficients) exhaust all the algebraic numbers for which the exponent $2+\varepsilon$ in Roth's theorem rel $\mathbb{Q}(i)$ may be reduced to $2$? Should we expect that all algebraic numbers not of this shape ought to satisfy Khintchine's principle rel $\mathbb{Q}(i)$? What are the special algebraic numbers in diophantine approximations rel a general given number field $K$? Finally, the same problem can be considered about $p$adic (and $S$adic) $K$rational approximations to algebraic numbers; I do not know if this has been done even for $K = \mathbb{Q}$.
References:
[1] D. Hensley: Continued Fractions (World Scientific, Singapore, 2006).
[2] D. Hensley: The Hurwitz complex continued fraction (2006): http://mosaic.math.tamu.edu/~dhensley/SanAntonioShort.pdf
[3] W. Bosma, D. Gruenewald: Complex numbers with bounded partial quotients, J. Aust. Math. Soc., vol. 93 (2012), pp. 920.

$\begingroup$ It is interesting for quadric irrational numbers and other irrational algebraic or other computable irrational numbers to have such a different property,moreover,transcendental number with such a property is easy to find ,but such a algebraic number's existence is difficult to be proved.Possibly we need new idea? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 31, 2014 at 6:13

2$\begingroup$ There is a basic trichotomy in diophantine approximations whereby algebraic numbers are divided into rationals, quadratic irrationalities, and numbers of degree $> 2$. It is a general principle that a number of the last type should have all the metric properties of a generic (in the a.e. sense) real number. For instance, it is easily seen that almost all reals are badly approximable to order $2+\varepsilon$, and correspondingly, we have Roth's deep theorem. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 31, 2014 at 6:39

1$\begingroup$ Lang's conjecture I mentioned is founded on this principle: for almost all $x \in \mathbb{R}$, the inequality $x  p/q < (q\log{q})^{2}$ has finitely many solutions. Clearly, almost all real numbers have unbounded partial fractions coefficients, so by the same principle we expect that so does every algebraic number of degree $> 2$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 31, 2014 at 6:40

$\begingroup$ I have gotten a lot of knowledge from your answer and comment,you know I have know very little a bit of Diophantine approximations,hope to have your more comment.thank you very much $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 31, 2014 at 6:42

My survey paper, Real numbers with bounded partial quotients, discusses this question a bit. It is in L'Enseignement Math. 38 (1992), 151187. In particular it seems that the first person to raise the unboundedness of the partial quotients of an algebraic number of degree > 2 was perhaps Khintchine in 1949. Some weak results on the growth of the partial quotients of algebraic numbers are summarized in section 4 of my survey.

$\begingroup$ If you contact me by email (use google) I'll send you a pdf. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 1, 2014 at 0:24

$\begingroup$ I have sent an email through my gmail to your email at waterloo U,since I have not found your gmail.Thank you again. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 1, 2014 at 1:03

$\begingroup$ There is the same question (unboundedness of the partial quotients of an algebraic number of degree > 2) in the 1st edition (1935) of the Khintchine's book, see page 59 here (Russian) books.eheritage.ru/book/10075050 $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 20, 2017 at 7:31

$\begingroup$ I mentioned this in my survey. But at the time I did not have access to the original Russian version of Khintchine's book. Thanks for the link! $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 20, 2017 at 14:40
I have one thought on this. But it would take some work to carry out.
(*) Perron (Die Lehre von den Ketterbrüchen) in Kap. 11 evaluates certain continued fractions with polynomial entries in terms of hypergeometric functions.
(**) There is an algorithm to determine when a hypergeometric function is an algebraic function.
Maybe these can be combined to get an example of an algebraic number with polynomial (and thus unbounded) denominators.
added: Examples of these two parts...
(*) The Perron method evaluates the (nonsimple) continued fraction $$ b_0+\frac{a_1}{b_1+\frac{a_2}{b_2}+\ddots}\qquad\text{with}\qquad a_n=18n^233n, b_n=3n2 $$ as $$ \frac{\frac{9}{2}}{{}_2F_1\left(\frac{5}{6},1;\frac{1}{2};\frac{1}{3}\right)} $$ Here, $a_n$ and $b_n$ are polynomials in $n$ which is what I meant by "polynomial entries" above.
(**) Unexpectedly, $$ {}_2F_1\left(\frac{1}{4},\frac{3}{4};\frac{2}{3};z\right) $$ is an algebraic function of $z$, see LINK
So, the (somewhat remote) hope would be that a case of continued fraction with $a_n=1$ evaluates to something in terms of hypergeometric functions on the list of known algebraic cases.

2$\begingroup$ I think in most cases the continued fractions for algebraic functions will not be simple continued fractions. For example: $$(x+1)^{1/3} = 1 + x/(3+x/(1+2x/(9+5x/\ldots)))$$ $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 1, 2014 at 22:56

3$\begingroup$ The @ in a comment on an answer only notifies people who have posted, edited, or commented on that answer. In particular, it didn't notify me, I was just pasing through and noticed it. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 2, 2014 at 5:08

4$\begingroup$ Continued fractions with polynomial coefficients violate the GaussKuzmin statistics (cf. page 33 in Shallit's survey), so they are not generic, and if we are to believe Khintchine's principle, no algebraic number of degree $> 2$ is expected to have polynomial continued fractions coefficients. So it would be extremely surprising (and very remarkable) if you could construct an example in this way. Anyway, the determination of the algebraic hypergeometric functions is a beautiful classical result (see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwarz's_list) [continued.] $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 2, 2014 at 7:17

1$\begingroup$ @XL_at_China: No, this has not been proved for neither $\pi$ nor any algebraic number, it is only expected to be true. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 3, 2014 at 18:43

1$\begingroup$ @XL_at_China: Roth's theorem provides a major evidence, as do some of the many (and farreaching) analogies with results in complex analysis (Nevanlinna's theory of the distribution of values of meromorphic maps). Anyway, it is just a conjecture. It could very well not be true, especially after the examples over $\mathbb{Q}(i)$ to which I have referred above. Many things remain mysterious regarding algebraic numbers and transcendence questions. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 3, 2014 at 20:36