If $G$ is a compact (Hausdorff) topological group with a dense cyclic subgroup, is it necessarily true that $G$ is first countable? This claim seems to be implicit in a paper that I am reading at the moment (the paper asserts the existence of a translation-invariant metric which induces the topology of $G$, which is equivalent by the Birkhoff-Kakutani theorem).

Previously posted at https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/852364/is-every-compact-monothetic-group-metrizable

  • $\begingroup$ Did you try using Pontryagin duality? $\endgroup$ – Benjamin Steinberg Jul 30 '14 at 16:10
  • $\begingroup$ @BenjaminSteinberg There is a natural map $f:\mathbb Z \to G$ sending 1 to a generator of the dense cyclic subgroup. The monomorphism $\widehat f: \widehat{G} \to \widehat{\mathbb{Z}}$ induced by duality identifies $\widehat G$ with a subgroup of $\widehat{\mathbb{Z}} \cong S^1$ (I use the word "identify" loosely, as the inverse of this monomorphism need not be continuous). Moreover, this subgroup is countable by separability of G. In particular, by Pontryagin duality, $G\cong \widehat{\widehat{G}}$ is isomorphic to the dual of a countable group. Does this imply the desired metrizability? $\endgroup$ – Saul Jul 30 '14 at 16:44
  • $\begingroup$ $G$ was not assumed separable. Indeed, if $S^1_\delta$ is $S^1$ endowed with the discrete topology, then its Pontryagin dual $G$ is a compact group with a dense cyclic subgroup, that is not first countable; since $S^1_\delta$ is isomorphic to $\mathbf{Q}^{(c)}\times\mathbf{Q}/\mathbf{Z}$, the group $G$ is isomorphic to $\hat{\mathbf{Q}}^{c}\times\hat{\mathbf{Z}}$, where $c$ is the continuum cardinal. In particular $(S^1)^c$ has a dense cyclic subgroup but is not first countable. $\endgroup$ – YCor Jul 30 '14 at 18:19
  • $\begingroup$ On the other hand if $G$ is both locally compact with a dense cyclic subgroup and totally disconnected then $G$ is either $\mathbf{Z}$ or a quotient of $\hat{Z}$, and hence is second countable. $\endgroup$ – YCor Jul 30 '14 at 18:20
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ I am probably being stupid in my sleep-deprivation, but regarding the original question, isn't the Bohr compactification of the integers non-metrizable? Cf. mathoverflow.net/questions/114816/… Maybe this has already been pointed out in the comments, in which case my apologies to Yves and Benjamin $\endgroup$ – Yemon Choi Jul 31 '14 at 1:33

No, a compact separable group need not be second countable and may contain ${\bf Z}$ as a dense subgroup. A simple example is a torus of infinite uncountable dimension.

So let $(1, \theta_i)_I$ be an algebraic basis of ${\bf R}$ over ${\bf Q}$. We consider the compact group $G = ({\bf R / Z})^I$ endowed with the product topology. $G$ is separable but not second countable. This follows from the following classical results (see e.g. Dugundji, "Topology").

A product of Hausdorff spaces (each with more than a point) is second countable if and only if the product is at most countable and all spaces are second countable.

A product of Hausdorff spaces (each with more than a point) is separable if and only if the product is at most the cardinality of the continuum and all spaces are separable.

Now let us consider the element $\theta = (\theta_i)_{i\in I} \in G$. The group ${\bf Z}\theta$ generated by $\theta$ is dense in $G$. Indeed this comes from the following facts.

  • For all finite $F \subset I$, the family $(1, \theta_i)_{i\in F}$ is free over ${\bf Q}$ hence the group generated by $(\theta_i)_{i\in F}$ is dense in $({\bf R / Z})^F$.

  • An open set in $G$ contains a pullback (via the canonical projection) of an open set in $({\bf R / Z})^F$ for some finite $F\subset I$.

Beware that this does not mean that any $y\in G$ can be approximated by a sequence of multiples of $\theta$. The group $G$ is neither second countable, first countable (By the Birkhoff-Kakutani theorem, as pointed out by YCor) nor sequentially compact. Being a cluster point does not allow to extract some converging subsequence.

  • $\begingroup$ Additional keyword: "Bohr compactification of $\mathbf{Z}$". $\endgroup$ – YCor May 23 '17 at 22:53
  • $\begingroup$ Note that you're using that a Hausdorff topological group is first-countable iff it's metrizable, by Birkhoff-Kakutani's theorem (and for a compact group this is equivalent to being second-countable). $\endgroup$ – YCor May 23 '17 at 22:58
  • $\begingroup$ @YCor Indeed, I edited the answer. $\endgroup$ – coudy May 24 '17 at 6:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.