Let $k$ be a field and $\{V_i\}_{i \in I}$ a filtered projective system of $k$-spaces with transition maps $f_{ji}: V_j \rightarrow V_i$ for $i \leq j$ (for my purposes we may assume the index set is $\mathbb{N}$). For each $i$, let $V_i^{**}$ be the double dual of $V_i$: here this is simply the algebraic dual, $Hom_k(Hom_k(V_i, k), k)$. The $V_i^{**}$ also form an projective system.

If $\varprojlim V_i^{**}$ is finite-dimensional over $k$, do we have $\varprojlim V_i \simeq \varprojlim V_i^{**}$? (Here there is no assumption that the $V_i$ themselves are finite-dimensional.)

Since $V_i \hookrightarrow V_i^{**}$ canonically for each $i$ and projective limit is left-exact, it follows that $\varprojlim V_i \hookrightarrow \varprojlim V_i^{**}$. Therefore the hypothesis implies that $\varprojlim V_i$ is also finite-dimensional, and isomorphic to its own double dual $(\varprojlim V_i)^{**}$. It would suffice to show that there is an injection $\varinjlim V_i^* \hookrightarrow (\varprojlim V_i)^*$, as this would dualize to a surjection $(\varprojlim V_i)^{**} \twoheadrightarrow (\varinjlim V_i^*)^* = \varprojlim V_i^{**}$ and the proof would be complete by comparing dimensions. There is a natural map $\varinjlim V_i^* \rightarrow (\varprojlim V_i)^*$ , induced by the duals of the structural maps $\pi_i: \varprojlim V_i \rightarrow V_i$, but even with the assumption that both source and target are finite-dimensional I can't seem to show that this map is injective (nor can I think of a counterexample).

  • $\begingroup$ Belated update: I only ended up needing the special case of this where the prosystem is Mittag-Leffler (lemma 5.14 of arXiv:1603.09743v3). As mentioned in that paper, Paul Garrett later showed me a (clever and tricky) argument for its truth in general. $\endgroup$ – Nick Switala May 5 '18 at 21:34

I think this is true. I'll try to prove the statement $$ \varinjlim V_i^* \hookrightarrow (\varprojlim V_i)^* $$ if the source is finite dimensional and $\varprojlim V_i$ is finite dimensional. I'll assume the indexing set is $\mathbb N$ but it should work for any cofiltered system.

First a reduction. If we let $V_i' = \operatorname{im}(\varprojlim V_i → V_i)$ then we can choose complements $V_i = V_i' \oplus V_i''$ such that $\{V_i''\}_i$ is an inverse system itself (using that $k$ is a field). Then the tower $V'$ is levelwise finite dimensional with limit $\varprojlim V_i$, and $\varprojlim V_i'' = 0$.

Now we have $$ \varinjlim V_i^* = \varinjlim (V_i')^* \oplus \varinjlim (V_i'')^* → (\varprojlim V_i')^* \oplus (\varprojlim V_i'')^* = (\varprojlim V_i)^*, $$ and on the left summands, this map is an isomorphism. So in the first statement we want to show, we can assume that $(\varprojlim V_i)^* = 0$, and hence $\varprojlim V_i = 0$.

If $\{V_i\}$ is pro-trivial (this means for every $i$ there's a $j>i$ such that $V_j → V_i$ is the zero map) then $\varinjlim V_i^* = 0$ as well, so let's assume it's not. Possibly by passing to a cofinal subtower, we can choose nonzero elements $α_i\colon V_i → k$ such that $α_i|_{\operatorname{im}V_{i+1}}=0$ and $α_i$ maps nontrivially to $V_{j}$ for $j<i$. All $α_i$ map trivially to the colimit $\varinjlim V_i^*$, but by their construction, we can take infinite sums $α_I = \sum_{i ∈ I} α_i$ for any $I \subseteq \mathbb N$ and those are nontrivial precisely if $I$ is infinite. Moreover, $α_I$ and $α_J$ are linearly independent in the colimit iff $I$ and $J$ differ at infinitely many places, and similarly for any finite set of $a_I$. Thus $\varinjlim V_i^*$ is infinite-dimensional.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Great; thanks much. Is there any way you could tell me a bit more about how the choices of $\alpha_i$ are made? I don't think I see yet how their existence follows from the assumption that the system is not pro-trivial. $\endgroup$ – Nick Switala Jul 21 '14 at 13:58
  • $\begingroup$ Oops! Yeah, you're right to worry. I had a system $\{V_i\}$ with injective maps in mind. In that case, you can assume all maps are proper injections (otherwise pass to a subsystem), and choose $α$ as I said (forget the nonsensical condition that it "maps nontrivially to $V_j$ for $j<i$"). For general $\{V_i\}$, it would suffice to construct a nontrivial sub-tower with proper injective maps. I'm not sure this always exists. $\endgroup$ – Tilman Jul 23 '14 at 13:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.