Let $f(t)$ be a nice Hölder continuous function. Also, suppose that $f$ is even. I'm interested in evaluating integrals of the form:

$$\oint (1-z)^{k+1}\int_0^1 \frac{f(t)}{(1-zt)^{n+1}}dtdz,$$

where for the contour integral, one may assume any loop around $z=1$. Equivalently, I'm interested in calculating Laurent expansions of $F_n(z):=\int_0^1\frac{f(t)}{(1-zt)^{n+1}}dt$ about $z=1$. Note that for $z\in(1,\infty)$, $F_n(z)$ is defined as a Cauchy principle value integral when $n$ is even and as as a Hadamard principle value integral when $n$ is odd. The primary difficulty I'm encountering is that when $z>1,$ the contour integral becomes rather nontrivial. In other words, one needs to understand what's going on as $z$ approaches the real axis to the right of 1. This looks like a sort of Riemann Hilbert problem to me, at least for the evaluation of $F_n(z)$. To this extent, is there a generalization of the Riemann Hilbert method for such double integrals? I mention this because I would like to consider $f_n(t)$, instead of $f(t)$ and then perform asymptotics on the Laurent series coefficeints, as $n\rightarrow\infty$.

Upon swapping integrals, it seems like the problem depends on whether it's a Cauchy or Hadamard integral. Specifically, there is a sharp transition when $1/t$ enters the area bounded by the $\lambda$ contour. This gives me a nonsensical answer that depends on the contour, which is impossible.

  • $\begingroup$ The "principal value" modification won't do anything if $n$ is odd and $0<z<1$, since $\lim \int_{|t-z|>\delta} f(t)/(t-z)^{2k} = \int f(t)/(t-z)^{2k}$ by MC. But you don't need to worry about this anyway, since $F_n$ is obviously holomorphic on $|z|>1$, which is enough to give you a Laurent expansion. $\endgroup$ Jul 5 '14 at 1:37
  • $\begingroup$ An obvious try would be to change the order of integration, evaluate the $z$ integral with the calculus of residues and see what happens. $\endgroup$ Jul 5 '14 at 2:33
  • $\begingroup$ @ChristianRemling: seeing as how it's a principle value integral for $z<1$, I'm not entirely sure how to justify the swap of integrals. When one factors out $t$ to get a power series in $z/t$, there's something going wrong at $t=0$. $\endgroup$
    – Alex R.
    Jul 5 '14 at 5:37
  • $\begingroup$ You don't need to expand, just use Fubini (for $|z|>1$). $\endgroup$ Jul 5 '14 at 23:10
  • $\begingroup$ @ChristianRemling: in my last comment I meant to say that swapping the integrals and doing contour integral first gives (via residues) something proportional to $1/t^{n+1+k}$, which is not integrable on $[0,1]$. Perhaps I'm being dense? $\endgroup$
    – Alex R.
    Jul 6 '14 at 0:12

define $f_{m}(t)$ for $m=1,2,\ldots$ by $\frac{d^{m}}{dt^{m}}f_{m}(t)=f(t)$,

with $\lim_{t\rightarrow 0}\frac{d^{n}}{dt^n}f_{m}(t)=0$ for $0\leq n<m$.

in particular, $f(t)=t^p$ produces $f_{m}(t)=t^{p+m}\frac{p!}{(p+m)!}$

Laurent expansion:

$$\int_0^1 \frac{f(t)}{(1-zt)^{n+1}}dt=\sum_{q=0}^\infty \frac{c_q}{(z-1)^{q+n+1}}$$

with coefficients


not quite the simple answer one might have desired, perhaps still of some use for the large-$n$ asymptotics.


insert a formal Taylor expansion $f(t)=\sum_{p=0}^{\infty}a_p t^{p}$ and integrate term by term,

$$\int_0^1 \frac{t^{p}}{(1-zt)^{n+1}}dt=\frac{1}{1+p}{}_2F_1(1+n,1+p,2+p;z)$$





return to the integral of $f(t)$,

$$\int_0^1 \frac{f(t)}{(1-zt)^{n+1}}dt=(1-z)^{-1-n}\frac{1}{n!}\sum_{q=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{(z-1)^q}\sum_{s=q}^{\infty}\frac{(n+s)!s!}{q!(s-q)!}\sum_{p=0}^{\infty}a_p\frac{p!}{(p+s+1)!}$$


$$=\sum_{q=0}^\infty \frac{c_q}{(z-1)^{q+n+1}}$$

with the coefficients $c_q$ given above.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, this looks like a great approach! There seems to be a bug though. A toy example of $f=1,n=1$ gives: $\int_0^11/(1-zt)^2dt=1/(1-z)$, whereas the expansion starts at $1/(1-z)^2$ (also the $c_q$ coefficients blow up). Hopefully this is just a minor index issue. $\endgroup$
    – Alex R.
    Jul 9 '14 at 18:06
  • $\begingroup$ Ok here's the issue, something I've been hit by again and again thinking about this problem. Just before the "return to the integral of $f(t)$", the summand $\sum_{s=q}^\infty $ is divergent when $p+1-q-n<0$. This issue arises because when you do the binomial expansion, you are effectively calculating ${}_2F_1(n+1,1,p+2;1)$, which is actually divergent when $p+2-1-n-1\leq 0$. $\endgroup$
    – Alex R.
    Jul 9 '14 at 19:27
  • $\begingroup$ you're right, it fails; I'll leave the answer for the record, but have made it CW to avoid more rep. $\endgroup$ Jul 10 '14 at 7:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The basic issue might be that in the new version of the question, it isn't even clear that $F_n$ has a Laurent expansion (the integral defining it [or not] is now singular for all real $z>1$). $\endgroup$ Jul 12 '14 at 19:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.