Suppose that $F$ is a sheaf of categories (on a Grothendieck site or even a topological space). By this, I mean a sheaf in the naive 1-categorical sense, so it can equivalently be viewed as a category object in sheaves of sets. By taking the nerve, one can view $F$ as a simplicial sheaf. $F$ will not take values in Kan complexes however (unless $F$ takes values in groupoids).

Question: Are there checkable conditions for $F$ to satisfy homotopy descent (besides the Cech diagram consisting of fibrations), in the sense that if $RF$ is the fibrant replacement of $F$ in the Joyal model structure on simplicial sheaves (so I'm modelling $\infty$-sheaves of $\infty$-groupoids here), then the canonical map $$F \to RF$$ is object-wise a weak equivalence of simplicial sets?

  • $\begingroup$ Have you looked at the old Joyal–Tierney paper on "strong stacks"? There they describe strict sheaves of groupoids but I am informed it also extends to strict sheaves of categories. $\endgroup$ – Zhen Lin Jul 3 '14 at 19:00
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks Zhen. I took a quick look, but it appears as they are considering stacks of categories, whereas, I want to consider stacks of infinity groupoids, but I want to represent the homotopy type by the nerve of a category, if you follow what I mean. $\endgroup$ – David Carchedi Jul 3 '14 at 19:25
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, I see. I thought you were talking about the other kind of descent condition. So the problem is to compute some homotopy limits... I don't know of any theorems in that direction. $\endgroup$ – Zhen Lin Jul 3 '14 at 22:55

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.