I raise this question following the reading of Fifty challenging problems in probability with solutions. One of the problem consists in computing the probability that the quadratic equation $x^2 + 2b x+c=0$ has complex roots. The "natural way" of doing it, is to suppose that the point $(b,c)$ is randomly chosen over a large square centered at the origin, with size $2B$. By following this path, the probability is equal to $0$ when $B$ approaches $+\infty$.
However, if you compute the probability over the rectangle $[-\sqrt{B},\sqrt{B}] \times [-B,+B]$, it is equal to $\frac{1}{3}$ and therefore is also the limit when $B$ approaches to $+\infty$.
I agree that the first way is "more natural". My question is: how to give more mathematical background to the "natural way"?
Thanks for your support on this "not so mathematical question".