I know there is a splitting lemma for groups, but is there a similar lemma for semigroups or monoids? And do you have the proof of that?

  • $\begingroup$ Well, I'm not sure what exactness ought to mean in the context of monoids, since the notion of "kernel" is a bit odd - for example, consider the monoid $N^+$ of natural numbers (including 0) together with $\infty$, and the monoid $T=(0, \infty)$. Then there is a homomorphism from $N^+$ to $T$ taking 0 to 0 and everything else to $\infty$ - clearly this map is not injective, but the "kernel" (preimage of 0) is $\{0\}$. I don't know, but I suspect that the "right" notion of exactness for semigroups/monoids is one which directly implies a splitting lemma. $\endgroup$ – Noah Schweber Jun 3 '14 at 23:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ (cont'd) See, however, mathoverflow.net/questions/83080/exact-sequence-of-monoids, where JBorger argues that there is no right notion of exactness for monoids. So maybe the answer is "mu" :). $\endgroup$ – Noah Schweber Jun 3 '14 at 23:05

You might look at Tilson's approach http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022404987901083 where the kernel of a monoid morphism is a category and wreath product decompositions are obtained.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.