4
$\begingroup$

Assume there are three differential oriented manifold $M_0$, $M_1$, $W$ with $\partial W= M_0 \coprod -M_1$. Denote dim $M_0$=dim $M_1$=n, and dim W=n+1.

We know that for the highest homology class, we have $\partial [W]= [M_0] -[M_1]$.

My question is can we say somethings about the lower homology class?

For example, (1)For given a homology cycle $[x_0]\in H_k(M_0;R)$(For $k\leq n$), does there exist a class $[x_1]\in H_k(M_1;R)$ and a complex $Y \subset W$ such that $\partial Y= [x_0]-[x_1]$ ?

(2)Assume dim $H_k(M_0;R)=l_0$, dim $H_k(M_1;R)=l_1$.For $M_0$ take $\phi_1,\phi_2,...\phi_{l_0}$ to be the generator of $H_k(M_0;R)$, take $[\alpha]=[\phi_1]+[\phi_2]+...+[\phi_{l_0}]$. Do the same for $M_1$, take $[\beta]= [\psi_1]+[\psi_2]+...[\psi_{l_1}]$, $\psi_1,\psi_2,...,\psi_{l_1} \in H_k(M_1;R)$ are generator. Does there exist a complex $Y \subset W$ such that $\partial Y= [\alpha]-[\beta]$ ?

Thank you very much for looking at this problem.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Ryan, how does $W=[0,1]$ give a counter-example to (1)? $\endgroup$
    – Mark Grant
    Jun 2, 2014 at 7:54
  • $\begingroup$ I apparently misread the quantifiers. $\endgroup$ Jun 2, 2014 at 8:19

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

Here is a somewhat stupid example, showing that the answer to both questions is no without some additional hypotheses.

Let $M_0 = S^1\times S^2$ and let $M_1 = S^3$. For our oriented cobordism, take $W=(S^1\times D^3)\sqcup D^4$. (It's actually a disjoint union of null-cobordisms). The generator $\alpha\in H_1(M_0;R)$ injects non-trivially into $H_1(W;R)$, and its image does not come from a class in $H_1(M_1;R)=0$.

This gives a negative answer to both questions. It's clear how to modify this to get counter-examples in any dimensions you wish. If you want a connected cobordism, just form from $W$ the connected sum of the two pieces.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

For your first question: maybe you want to know whether the map $H_{k+1}(W,M_0\cup M_1)\to H_k(M_0)$ is surjective.

The ``answer'' is that this map sits inside the long exact sequence for the triple $(W,M_0\cup M_1,M_1)$:

$H_{k+1}(W,M_0\cup M_1)\to H_k(M_0\cup M_1,M_1)\cong H_k(M_0)\to H_k(W,M_1)$

For the second question a consideration of the long exact sequence for the pair $(W,M_0\cup M_1)$ might help:

$H_{k+1}(W,M_0\cup M_1)\to H_k(M_0\cup M_1)\to H_k(W)$

Saying that $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are the sums of generators of the homology group is in general not much information: all non-zero classes can be written in this form.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.