1
$\begingroup$

Let $K=\mathbb F_q((t))$. I want to prove that $K^{sep}$ is composite of $K^{sep}(p)$ and $K^{sep}(not \ p)$, where $K^{sep}(p)$ is maximal Galois extension of $K$ of exponent $p$, $K^{sep}(not \ p)$ is a maximal Galois extension of $K$ such that order of every element of $Gal(K^{sep}(not \ p)/K)$ is prime to $p$. Let $L/K$ be finite Galois extension, if it is totally ramified then $G=G_0$ and $G_0 = G_1 \rtimes G_0/G_1,G_1$ is $p$-group, $\gcd(|G_0/G_1|,p)=1$ and we are done. But I can't understand what should I do if extension isn't totally ramified.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Three comments: first, $K^{sep}=L^{sep}$ where $L:=\overline{\mathbf{F}_q}((t))$. Second, every finite Galois extension of $L$ is totally ramified, with Galois group being a semidirect product of a normal $p$-subgroup by a cyclic prime-to-$p$ subgroup. Third, such semidirect products do not correspond to composita of field in the way you suggest, since your condition forces the group to be a direct product rather than a semidirect product. $\endgroup$ – Michael Zieve May 21 '14 at 21:56
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @MichaelZieve: The field you call $L$ isn't algebraic over $K$, due to the intervention of formal power series. I think you mean $L$ to be the maximal unramified extension of $K$, which is to say the direct limit of the finite extensions $\mathbf{F}_{q^n}(\!(t)\!) = \mathbf{F}_{q^n} \otimes_{\mathbf{F}_q} K$ of $K$. $\endgroup$ – user76758 May 22 '14 at 4:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In other words, $\overline{\mathbf{F}_q}\otimes_{\mathbf{F}_q}\mathbf{F}_{q}(\!(t)\!)$. $\endgroup$ – Kevin Ventullo May 22 '14 at 7:09
  • $\begingroup$ @user76758: thanks for the correction. To salvage something of what I said, I just wanted to make the simple observation that the absolute Galois group of $\overline{\mathbf{F}_q}((t))$ is a subgroup of the absolute Galois group of $\mathbf{F}_q((t))$, and that we can say things about the former absolute Galois group. $\endgroup$ – Michael Zieve May 22 '14 at 8:38
6
$\begingroup$

This is not correct. If it was the compositum then you would get that the absolute Galois group is a product of pro-$p$ group and pro-$p$' groups (i.e. inverse limit of prime to $p$ finite groups). This is obviously wrong, since for example, if you take prime $\ell$ such that $p=1\pmod \ell$. Then the nonabelian group $C_p \rtimes C_\ell$ (with respect to an embedding of $C_{\ell}\to Aut(C_{p})$) is realizable over $\overline{\mathbb{F}}_q((t))$ but is not a product of $p$-group and prime-to-$p$ group.

BTW: $C_m$ denotes a cyclic group of order $m$

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Can you give me an example for an extension with Galois group equal to $C_\ell \rtimes C_p$, please? $\endgroup$ – user51074 May 21 '14 at 18:13
  • $\begingroup$ @MichaelZieve Thanks, I've corrected it $\endgroup$ – Lior Bary-Soroker May 22 '14 at 5:42
  • $\begingroup$ @user51074, for example take $K((t^{1/2}))/K((t))$ which is a $C_2$ extension and extend it further by adding a root of the Artin-Schreier equation $X^p-X = t^{-1/2}$. (Here $\ell=2$ and $p$ is an odd prime.) $\endgroup$ – Lior Bary-Soroker May 22 '14 at 5:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.