9
$\begingroup$

In Cox's book "Primes of the form $x^2 + ny^2$", he proves that in a quadratic imaginary field $K$, if $\mathcal O$ is an order of conductor $f \in \mathbb Z$, we have that the class group $\mathrm{Cl}(\mathcal O)$ of $\mathcal O$ is isomorphic to the quotient $I_K(f) / P_{K,\mathbb Z}(f)$, where $I_K(f)$ is the free abelian group generated by the prime ideals of $\mathcal O_K$ coprime to $f\mathcal O_K$, and $P_{K,\mathbb Z}(f)$ is the subgroup of principal ideals $\alpha \mathcal O_K$ where $\alpha$ is congruent mod $f\mathcal O_K$ to an integer coprime to $f$ (proposition 7.22). So $\mathrm{Cl}(\mathcal O)$ is a quotient of the ray class group relative to $f\mathcal O_K$.

I suspect a more general result, but I cannot find any reference. Let $K$ be a number field, and $\mathcal O$ an order of conductor $\mathfrak f \subset \mathcal O_K$,

Can $\mathrm{Cl}(\mathcal O)$ be expressed as a quotient of $\mathrm{Cl}_\mathfrak f(K)$, the ray class group of $K$ relative to $\mathfrak f$ ?

The problem actually boils down to proving that the map $$\varphi : I_K(\mathfrak f) \longrightarrow \mathrm{Cl}(\mathcal O) : \mathfrak a \longmapsto \mathfrak [\mathfrak a \cap \mathcal O]$$ is a surjection. Indeed, if it is the case, then $\mathrm{Cl}(\mathcal O) \cong I_K(\mathfrak f) / \ker(\varphi)$, but it is easy to see that $P_K(\mathfrak f) \subset \ker(\varphi)$ (where $P_K(\mathfrak f)$ is from the definition of the ray class group, i.e. $\mathrm{Cl}_\mathfrak f(K) \cong I_K(\mathfrak f) / P_K(\mathfrak f)$), so $\mathrm{Cl}(\mathcal O)$ would be a quotient of $\mathrm{Cl}_\mathfrak f(K)$.

Is $\varphi$ surjective ?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I think there's something a bit odd here. According to Magma, if $\mathcal{O}_{K} = \mathbb{Z}[i]$ and $f = 5$, then ${\rm Cl}(\mathcal{O}) \cong \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$, but the ray class group associated to the ideal $(5)$ of $\mathbb{Z}[i]$ is $\mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z}$. I seem to remember there was a difference between the "ray class fields" and the "ring class fields", but I've lent my copy of Cox's book to a student. $\endgroup$ May 10, 2014 at 23:35
  • $\begingroup$ You are right there is a mistake. He proves that $\mathrm{Cl}(\mathcal O)$ is isomorphic to $I_K(f) / P_{K,\mathbb Z}(f)$ ($I_K(f)$ is the free abelian group generated by the prime ideals coprime to $f\mathcal O_K$, and $P_{K,\mathbb Z}(f)$ is the subgroup of principal ideals generated by some $\alpha$ congruent to an integer mod $f\mathcal O_K$), which is not exactly the ray class group (we have this extra condition about the integer). I'll update my question, which becomes : can $\mathrm{Cl}(\mathcal O)$ be expressed as a quotient of $\Cl_\mathfrak f(K)$ ? $\endgroup$
    – Calodeon
    May 10, 2014 at 23:48

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

The answer is yes, essentially by weak approximation.

Let $\mathbb{I}_K=\prod'_{v}K_v$ denote the finite Idelles over $K$. Now let $\prod_v\mathcal{O}_v^{\times}=\widehat{\mathcal{O}}^{\times}$ denote the multiplicative group of the completion of $\mathcal{O}$. Then (as Cox explains) you can write

$$Cl(\mathcal{O}) = K^{\times}\backslash\mathbb{I}_K/\widehat{\mathcal{O}}^{\times}.$$

Also letting $\mathbb{I}_{K,f}:=\prod'_{v\not\mid f}K_v$ we have $$I_K(f) = \mathbb{I}_{K,f}/\prod_{v\not\mid f}\mathcal{O}_{K,v}^{\times}.$$

Then the map $I_K(f)\rightarrow Cl(\mathcal{O})$ is induced by the natural inclusion $\mathbb{I}_{K,f}\hookrightarrow \mathbb{I}_K$ so your question amounts to establishing the equality $$\prod_{v\mid f}K^{\times}_v = K^{\times}\cdot\prod_{v\mid f}\mathcal{O}_v^{\times}.$$

Weak approximation says that $K^{\times}$ is dense in $\prod_{v\mid f}K^{\times}_v$, which implies your claim.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.