I have deleted a previous, now obsolete question on the same topic.

Take the well-known Riemann integral:

$$\displaystyle \pi^{-\frac{s}{2}}\,\Gamma\left(\frac{s}{2}\right)\, \zeta(s) =\int_1^{\infty} \left({x}^{\frac{s}{2}-1} + {x}^{-\frac{s}{2}-\frac12}\right)\,\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}e^{-\pi\,n^2\,x}\, \text{d}x - \frac{1}{s\,(1-s)}$$

and move $\frac{1}{s\,(1-s)}$ to the RHS to make both sides entire and call it $\widehat{\xi}(s)$:

$$\displaystyle \widehat{\xi}(s)=\pi^{-\frac{s}{2}}\,\Gamma\left(\frac{s}{2}\right)\, \zeta(s) + \frac{1}{s\,(1-s)} =\int_1^{\infty} \left({x}^{\frac{s}{2}-1} + {x}^{-\frac{s}{2}-\frac12}\right)\,\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}e^{-\pi\,n^2\,x}\, \text{d}x$$

The function $\widehat{\xi}(s) = \widehat{\xi}(1-s)$ induces an infinite number of symmetrical zero ($\mu$) foursomes. enter image description here

After calculating the first 100.000 $\mu$'s (i.e. 400.000 zeros), I strongly believe that $\widehat{\xi}(s)$ has the following Hadamard product ( ' denotes that also $\overline{\mu_n},1-\mu_n,1-\overline{\mu_n}$ should be included in the operation):

$$\displaystyle \widehat{\xi}(s) = \widehat{\xi}(0) \prod_{n=1}^{\infty}' \Bigl(1-\frac{s}{\mu_n}\Bigr)$$

Where $\widehat{\xi}(0)=\widehat{\xi}(1) = 1+\frac12\gamma -\ln(2)-\frac12\,\ln(\pi)$ which also equals $\sum_{ \rho }\Bigl( \frac{1}{\rho}+\frac{1}{1-\rho}\Bigr)$.

It then simply follows that:

$$\displaystyle \pi^{-\frac{s}{2}}\,\Gamma\left(\frac{s}{2}\right)\, \zeta(s) + \frac{1}{s\,(1-s)} = \widehat{\xi}(0) \prod_{n=1}^{\infty}' \Bigl(1-\frac{s}{\mu_n}\Bigr)$$

This allows equating the logarithmic derivatives $\frac{\widehat{\xi}'}{\widehat{\xi}}(s)$ of both sides and injecting $s=1$ gives:

$$\displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}'\Bigl(\frac{1}{\mu_n}\Bigr)=\scriptsize{\frac{2\ln(\pi)^2+(8 \ln(2)-4\gamma)\ln(\pi)+8\ln(2)^2-6\gamma^2-8\gamma\ln(2)+\pi^2-16\gamma_1-16}{16+8\gamma-16\ln(2)-8\ln(\pi)}}$$

Also, the equation allows to express $\zeta(s)$ in terms of the $\mu$-zeros:

$$\displaystyle \zeta(s) = \dfrac{\widehat{\xi}(0) \prod_{n=1}^{\infty}' \Bigl(1-\frac{s}{\mu_n}\Bigr)-\frac{1}{s\,(1-s)}}{\pi^{-\frac{s}{2}}\,\Gamma\left(\frac{s}{2}\right)\,}$$

and the RHS induces a non-trivial zero $\rho$ when: $\displaystyle \widehat{\xi}(0) \prod_{n=1}^{\infty}' \Bigl(1-\frac{s}{\mu_n}\Bigr)=\frac{1}{s\,(1-s)}$.

Note that the zeros of $\widehat{\xi}(s)$ follow a surprisingly regular pattern. I believe this pattern originates from them all residing increasingly deeper in the domain $\Re(s)>1$. In this domain $\zeta(s)$ is well behaved and rapidly approaches $1$ when $\Re(s) \rightarrow \infty$. So, in $\pi^{-\frac{s}{2}}\,\Gamma\left(\frac{s}{2}\right)\, \zeta(s)$, the component $\zeta(s)$ will have a negligible influence on the location of the $\mu$'s. $\Gamma\left(\frac{s}{2}\right)$ can be expressed in terms of one of its Stirling approximation and the result follows that for $\Re(s) \rightarrow +\infty$, the function $\widehat{\xi}(s)$ will induce increasingly more accurate zeros $\mu$ and $\overline{\mu}$ when:

$$\displaystyle 2\,(s-1)\,\sqrt{\pi\,s}=\left(\frac{2\,e\,\pi}{s}\right)^{\frac{s}{2}}$$

Since $\widehat{\xi}(s) = \widehat{\xi}(1-s)$ the zeros $1-\mu,\overline{1-\mu}$ can be simply derived.


Assuming this Hadamard product can indeed be proven, does the apparent regular pattern of the $\mu$'s impose any constraint on where the non-trivial zeros $\rho$ of $\zeta(s)$ can reside in the critical strip (e.g. could it imply a zero-free region)?


There is no problem in proving the Hadamard product if you write it as $$\hat{\xi}(s)=\hat{\xi}(0)\prod_{\mu}\bigg(1-\frac{s}{\mu}\bigg)\bigg(1-\frac{s}{1-\mu}\bigg)$$

Also, your observation about behavior of $\mu$ is correct. However, you can't get anything about Riemann zeros out of this. To put it in simple terms, the reason for this is that you can replace your function by something like $$\pi^{-s/2}\Gamma(s/2)\zeta(s)\bigg[1+\frac{a}{(s-\rho)(s-\overline{\rho})}\bigg]+\frac{1}{s(1-s)},$$ (where $\zeta(\rho)=0$ is a zero you like), and you will still have the same pattern.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks Alex. Makes sense. To proof the Hadamard product, I have tried (assuming $\hat{\xi}(s)$ has order $1$) to solve $A$ and $B$ from $\displaystyle \hat{\xi}(s)=e^{A+B\,s}\prod_{\mu}\bigg(1-\frac{s}{\mu}\bigg)\, e^{\frac{s}{\mu}}$ by equating the logarithmic derivatives of both sides. This way, I can derive $A$ and $B$, however I struggle to make the final step towards $\widehat{\xi}(0)=\widehat{\xi}(1) = 1+\frac12\gamma -\ln(2)-\frac12\,\ln(\pi)$ (i.e. getting rid of the e-powers). Would you be so kind to share (a sketch of) your proof in the answer? $\endgroup$ – Agno May 11 '14 at 17:23
  • $\begingroup$ This function does have order 1. The idea of my (very well known) proposal is to get rid of exponents by taking the roots in pairs. (By the way, I missed $\exp(Bs)$; I forgot that the function isn't actually even.) But you may proceed your way very well, too. The product your wrote in the comments converges because $\hat{\xi}$ has order 1 (and other good properties). So, I do not understand what's exactly the problem. $\endgroup$ – Alex Gavrilov May 12 '14 at 11:27
  • $\begingroup$ I may try and help you more if you explain it. $\endgroup$ – Alex Gavrilov May 12 '14 at 11:32
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks Alex. No need for further help, I got it now :-) $\endgroup$ – Agno May 12 '14 at 21:20

protected by Todd Trimble Aug 8 '16 at 9:22

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.