We say that a space $X$ has a homology $p$-exponent if some power of $p$ annihilates the $p$-torsion in $H_\ast(X;\mathbb{Z})$.

I am interested in the homology exponents of the free infinite loop space $QX=\Omega^\infty\Sigma^\infty X$. Apparently, by examining the Bockstein spectral sequence, it should be possible to determine the integral homology of $QX$ as a functor of the integral homology of $X$ (see May's Homology operations on infinite loop spaces, Remark 2.6). Before I get into the gory details of this calculation, however, I would like to ask if the following is known.

If $X$ is a space with a homology $2$-exponent, must $QX$ have a homology $2$-exponent also?


By May's Remark 2.6, the answer should be no. If $X$ is a Moore space with $\tilde H_*(X; Z) = Z/p$ concentrated in an odd degree $2q-1$, and $\tilde H_*(X; Z/p) = Z/p\{x, y\}$ with $\beta_1(y) = x$, then in $H_*(Q(X); Z/p)$ the $r$-th Bockstein $\beta_r$ is defined and nonzero on $y^{p^{r-1}}$ for each $r\ge1$, so $H_*(Q(X); Z)$ contains a copy of $Z/p^r$ in degree $2p^{r-1}q-1$. Hence there is no uniform power of $p$ that annihilates all the $p$-torsion.


I think that the answer is no, but possibly for dumb reasons. There is a model for $QX$ (when $X$ is connected):

$$QX \simeq \coprod_n E\Sigma_n \times_{\Sigma_n} X^{\times n} / \sim$$

where $\Sigma_n$ is the symmetric group, and so $E\Sigma_n$ is taken to be the ordered configuration space of $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^\infty$. We think of this as the space of points in $\mathbb{R}^\infty$ labelled by points of $X$. The relation $\sim$ drops points when their label is the basepoint.

Snaith has shown that this space stably splits along the filtration by the number $n$. When $X = S^k$ (with $k>0$), the split summands are identifiable as the Thom space $B\Sigma_n^{k\gamma_n}$, where $\gamma_n = \mathbb{R}^n$ is the permutation representation of $\Sigma_n$, and $k\gamma_n$ is its $k$-fold sum. Its homology is then a shift by $nk$ of the homology of $\Sigma_n$ with coefficients in the $k$th tensor power of the sign representation:

$$\tilde{H}_{*+nk}(B\Sigma_n^{k\gamma_n}) = H_*(\Sigma_n, sign^{\otimes k})$$

since the action of $\Sigma_n$ on the top dimensional homology of $\gamma_n \cup \{ \infty\}$ is by the sign representation. In particular, if $k$ is even, this is the trivial representation.

So take $X = S^2$; it has a homology exponent $0$, since $1 = p^0$ annihilates all of the $p$-torsion in $H_*(X)$. However, the homology of $QX$ contains $H_*(S_n, \mathbb{Z})$ for all $n$. There is an argument that I learned in Remark 1.11 of this nice paper by Pakianathan which shows that the homology $p$-exponent of the Sylow $p$ subgroup $S(p^n) \leq \Sigma_{p^n}$ is $p^n$. Now take an element in $H_*(S(p^n), \mathbb{Z})$ realizing that exponent, and transfer it up to an element $x_n \in H_*(\Sigma_{p^n})$ to get a family of elements $\{x_1, x_2, \dots\}$ of unbounded homology $p$-exponent in $H_*(QS^2)$.

Now, if you restrict your attention to connected spaces $X$ with entirely torsion homology, I think that if $X$ has a $p$-exponent, then so does $QX$. The reason is that we can again use the Snaith splitting to get

$$H_*(QX) = \bigoplus_n H_*(E\Sigma_{n+} \wedge_{\Sigma_n} (X^{\wedge n}))$$

and you can compute $H_*(E\Sigma_{n+} \wedge_{\Sigma_n} (X^{\wedge n}))$ as the target of a spectral sequence whose $E_2$ term is $H_*(\Sigma_{n}, \tilde{H}_*(X^{\wedge n}))$. If the homology $p$-exponent of $X$ is $m$, then $p^m$ kills the module $\tilde{H}_*(X^{\wedge n})$ (using the Künneth theorem), and hence this group homology. There might be some extension problems in the SS that I'm ignoring here, but if they can be resolved, then $p^m$ must kill $H_*(QX)$.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In light of John's answer, I'm guessing that I can't ignore the extension problems. $\endgroup$ – Craig Westerland May 8 '14 at 14:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.