4
$\begingroup$

I have seen references to the "tilting method" in the theory of large deviations. Is there a simple explanation of what this is, exactly?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There is a brief discussion of tilting in section 23.4 of Klenke's book Probability Theory. A Comprehensive Course, Springer Verlag, 2008. $\endgroup$ Apr 15, 2014 at 15:51

1 Answer 1

14
$\begingroup$

Tilting refers to a change of measure of the form $e^{\lambda \cdot x}/C(\lambda)$ where $C(\lambda)=E(e^{\lambda\cdot X})$. (The setup is that the measure for which you are proving large deviations is a topological vector space $X$, and $\lambda$ is in the dual space to $X$). The name tilting comes because the effect of the change of measure translates to modifying the ``typical behavior'' under the tilted measure; more technically, the tilting adds a linear term to the log-moment generating function, and that translates to a linear shift in the corresponding Legendre transform that will represent the rate function.

EDIT (in response to Igor's further question in comment): The reason you change measure is the following. You are trying to compute $P_n(A)$ which is small. Write now $$P_n(A)=\int_A dQ_n (dP_n/dQ_n)$$ and choose $Q_n$ such that $Q_n(A)$ is large (i.e., make $A$ "typical", so that $n^{-1}\log Q_n(A)\sim 0$). Now if $(dP_n/dQ_n)$ is almost constant on $A$, say equal $e^{-nJ}$, then you are happy because then $P_n(A)\sim e^{-nJ} Q_n(A)$. The devil is in the details of the words ``almost constant'' and $\sim$ but this is roughly the idea.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, but why would one do such a thing? Presumably you want to prove your large deviation result with a given measure.... $\endgroup$
    – Igor Rivin
    Apr 15, 2014 at 18:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.