The following is an addition to A function from partitions to natural numbers - is it familiar?; the function $f(\lambda)$ as defined there, when summed over all partitions of n, gives an unexpected hit in Checked up to n=36.

In short:
Define $g(x, q)$ by $$\frac{\partial g(x,q)}{\partial x}=g(x,q)^2 * g(q x,q),$$ with series $$g(x,q)=\sum _{k=0}^{\infty } \frac{ c_k(q) x^k}{k!},$$ define $t_{n}=n(n+1)/2$; then the coefficient of $q^{t_{n-1}}$ in $c_{n+1}(q)$ is $\sum{_{\lambda \in n}}{f(\lambda)}.$

f(n=2)=6 and $c_{3}(q) =q^3+2 q^2+6 q+6$ ; $q^{t_{1}} = q^1$ with coeff. =6.
Likewise f(n=3)=14 and $c_{4}(q) =q^6+2 q^5+6 q^4+14 q^3+22 q^2+36 q+24$ ;
$q^{t_{2}} = q^3$ with coeff. =14;

Remark that the differential equation has no closed form solution, but its series can be generated upto $x^n$ for any given n.

Question: are there any arguments to trust\distrust this conjecture? Can it be proved ?

correction 28/05/2014 22:02 CET: the differntial equation has a product in the RHS, not a sum. Thanks to Pietro for spotting it.

  • 1
    If you are going to post here regularly, it would be nice if you looked into the ways to format mathematics on this website. – Gerry Myerson Apr 13 '14 at 1:27
  • @GerryMyerson: should look better now? – Wouter M. Apr 13 '14 at 15:54
  • @NateEldredge: extra dollar signs left as an excercise to the poster? – Wouter M. Apr 13 '14 at 22:02
  • That was something I missed when I was editing it. It was my fault and not the OP's fault. Sorry. – Daniel Parry Apr 13 '14 at 23:10
  • 1
    A typo? Comparing with the OEIS link, I guess the differential equation for $g$ has a product, not a sum, in the RHS. – Pietro Majer May 28 '14 at 14:10

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.