Covering the space by disjoint unit circles Andrzej Szulkin [MR0719756] (thanks to Alexey Ustinov for the reference) proved the following two interesting theorems.
Theorem 1. The Euclidean plane $\mathbb{R}^2$ is not a union of nondegenerate disjoint circles.
Theorem 2. The Euclidean space $\mathbb{R}^3$ is a union of nondegenerate disjoint circles.
In the second of the two main parts of the proof, he blows a circle until it fits his needs. Thinking about this, it seems that if one uses rotations instead, one obtains the following theorem.
Theorem 3. The Euclidean space $\mathbb{R}^3$ is a union of disjoint unit circles.
The reason is that fixing a point on the unit circle, the intersection of every three rotations about this point contains just this point.
I think this version is more cute. E.g., note that the analogous version of Theorem 1 becomes much more obvious when restricting to unit circles (one can have at most countably many disjoint unit circles in the plane!). Also, unit circles are not special. One only needs the following property of the desired curve.
Free Rotations Property. There exists a point on the curve such that, considering rotations of the curve about this point, every uncountable intersection of such rotations contains only the rotation point.
Thus, the theorem applies, e.g., to any regular polygon of perimeter 1, or even to a
fixed "8" shape (a nice name for Theorem 3 may thus be Room for 8 :) ). In the plane,
it is known that even if we allow deforming the 8 figures, we cannot have more than countably many of disjoint 8's.
In fact, I do not know a curve not having the Free Rotations Property.
Maybe even for each "nice enough" curve there is a finite number $k$ and a rotation point
on it such that every $k$ rotations intersect in one point only.
My questions (
Assuming that my analysis is correct ):
Is the above known? If yes, could you provide a reference?
What is the largest known class of curves with the mentioned Free Rotations Property?
 A: Here is an answer to your question in another post.  Is it possible to partition $\mathbb R^3$ into unit circles? Unfortunately it's not a constructive solution, so we're still missing that. 
I do know a nice constructive solution using circles of unbounded radii. 
Consider the points on the $x$ axis $(4n + 1, 0, 0)$ for $n \in Z$.   Consider the circles of radius $1$ on the $x-y$ plane with center at these points.  
Now consider all spheres with radius $r>0$ and center $(0,0,0)$.  Each such sphere intersects the set of these circles at exactly two points.  Remove these two points from the sphere.  What remains of the sphere can certainly be decomposed into disjoint circles.  Altogether we have a partition of $R^3$ into a disjoint union of circles. 
This solution was pointed out to me many years ago by Yuval Peres.    
A: In their article  Partitions of $\mathbb{R}^3$ into curves, Mathematica Scandinavica 1998, the authors M. Jonsson and J. Wästlund show that space can be partitioned in unlinked unit circles or other kinds of curves. 

Abstract. A general technique for obtaining partitions of $\mathbb{R}^3$ into curves satisfying various properties is 
  presented. The method can be used to partition $\mathbb{R}^3$ into unlinked circles of radius one, which
  answers a question posed by Wilker [7], or into arbitrary collections of real analytic curves. We
  also apply the method to study the set of bijections of the open unit disk.

