0
$\begingroup$

Let $(\Omega,\mathcal{F})$ denote some measurable space. Let $P_1$ and $P_2$ denote respectively two probability measures. Now let $\mathcal{G}$ be some sub sigma-algebra of $\mathcal{F}$. Given a positive integrable random variable $X$, we can define respectively the conditional expectation

$$Y_1=E^{P_1}[X|\mathcal{G}],~ Y_2=E^{P_2}[X|\mathcal{G}]$$

Now for some $0<\alpha<1$, we can define a new probability measure $P=\alpha P_1+(1-\alpha)P_2$, then we get

$$Y=E^{P}[X|\mathcal{G}]$$

Now my question is whether we can prove

$$\operatorname{esssup}{}_P(Y)\le \max\Big( \operatorname{esssup}_{P_1}(Y_1), \operatorname{esssup}_{P_2}(Y_2)\Big)?$$

Thanks a lot for the help!

$\endgroup$
8
  • $\begingroup$ Doesn't this follow since $Y$ is a convex combination of $Y_1$ and $Y_2$? $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 1, 2014 at 14:08
  • $\begingroup$ It is not so evident since the $esssup$ are taken under different probability measures... $\endgroup$
    – CodeGolf
    Commented Apr 1, 2014 at 14:29
  • $\begingroup$ I think you can say there's only one measure, namely $P$, and say that everything ($P_1$ and $P_2$) are abs. cts. with respect to it. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 1, 2014 at 15:15
  • $\begingroup$ thx for your reply, could you please give more details for the proof? $\endgroup$
    – CodeGolf
    Commented Apr 1, 2014 at 15:16
  • $\begingroup$ Lemma: $E^P Z = \alpha E^{P_1} Z + (1-\alpha) E^{P_2} Z$. Corollary: $Y = \alpha Y_1 + (1-\alpha) Y_2$. Also useful: since $P_1 \ll P$, $\operatorname{esssup}_{P_1} Z \le \operatorname{esssup}_{P} Z$. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 1, 2014 at 20:11

2 Answers 2

3
$\begingroup$

Let me denote (for consistency) by $\mathbb{P}_0$, $\mathbb{P}_1$ the given probabilities (rather than $\mathbb{P}_1$, $\mathbb{P}_2$), and set $\mathbb{P}_\alpha=(1-\alpha)\mathbb{P}_0 + \alpha\mathbb{P}_1$. Let $\mathbb{Q}$ be any probability such that $\mathbb{P}_0\ll\mathbb{Q}$ and $\mathbb{P}_1\ll\mathbb{Q}$ (any $\mathbb{P}_\alpha$ would be fine in fact, but it does not matter). Then $\mathbb{P}_\alpha\ll\mathbb{Q}$ and $G_\alpha=(1-\alpha)G_0 + \alpha G_1$, where $G_\alpha=\frac{d\mathbb{P}_\alpha}{d\mathbb{Q}}$.

It is easy to check (see below) that $$ Y_\alpha = \frac{\mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}[XG_\alpha|\mathcal{G}]}{\mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}[G_\alpha|\mathcal{G}]} = \frac{(1-\alpha)\mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}[XG_0|\mathcal{G}]+\alpha\mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}[XG_1|\mathcal{G}]} {(1-\alpha)\mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}[G_0|\mathcal{G}]+\alpha\mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}[G_1|\mathcal{G}]}. $$ To prove the claimed inequality, it is sufficient to notice that the real function $$ \alpha \mapsto\frac{(1-\alpha)x_0 + \alpha x_1}{(1-\alpha)p_0 + \alpha p_1} $$ is either non--decreasing or non--increasing.

To conclude, let me prove that, if $\mathbb{P}\ll\mathbb{Q}$ and $G=\frac{d\mathbb{P}}{d\mathbb{Q}}$, then $$ \mathbb{E}^\mathbb{P}[X|\mathcal{G}] = \frac{\mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}[XG|\mathcal{G}]}{\mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}[G|\mathcal{G}]}. $$ First, if $A=\{\mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}[G|\mathcal{G}]=0\}$, then $$ \mathbb{P}[A] = \mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}[G \mathbf{1}_A] = \mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}\bigl[\mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}[G|\mathcal{G}]\mathbf{1}_A\bigr] = 0 $$ and the formula makes sense. For every $A\in\mathcal{G}$, $$ \mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}\bigl[\mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}[XG|\mathcal{G}]\mathbf{1}_A\bigr] = \mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}[XG\mathbf{1}_A] = \mathbb{E}^\mathbb{P}[X\mathbf{1}_A] = \mathbb{E}^\mathbb{P}\bigl[\mathbb{E}^\mathbb{P}[X|\mathcal{G}]\mathbf{1}_A\bigr] $$ $$ = \mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}\bigl[\mathbb{E}^\mathbb{P}[X|\mathcal{G}]G\mathbf{1}_A\bigr] = \mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}\bigl[\mathbb{E}^\mathbb{P}[X|\mathcal{G}]\mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}[G|\mathcal{G}]\mathbf{1}_A\bigr], $$ therefore $\mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}[XG|\mathcal{G}] = \mathbb{E}^\mathbb{P}[X|\mathcal{G}]\mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}[G|\mathcal{G}]$.

$\endgroup$
0
1
$\begingroup$

Yes. Using $E_1,E_2$ for the two expectations, if for any $A\in\mathcal{G}$ we have $E_i(X 1_A) \le C P_i(A)$ then the same holds for the convex combination.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.