1
$\begingroup$

Let $P(x)$ and $Q(x)$ be two general polynomial of the same degree $d$ (d can be arbitrary large). Consider the surface $S : z^2 = P(x) Q(y)$ in the projective space $\mathbb{P}^3$. I want to prove the following assertion (which I'm almost sure that should be true):

If the coefficients of the polynomials $P$ and $Q$ are chosen generically, then the surface $S$ is a hyperbolic surface in $\mathbb{P}^3$. Equivalently, I wish to show that there is no rational/elliptic curve on the surface $S$.

By hyperbolicity I mean there is no non-constant holomorphic function $f: \mathbb{C} \rightarrow S$.

Note that the surface $S$ is a singular surface with singularities at $(a_i, b_j, 0)$ where $a_i$ and $b_j$ are roots of the polynomials $P$ and $Q$ respectively.\

Jason, thanks, I think in your answer you mean the hyperbolicity of $D(zw)$ rather than $D(y)$. Also what is the generic condition on the polynomials $P$ and $Q$? Is the affine surface D(zw) in the above surface $S$ always hyperbolic?

If we consider the equation $S$ on a number field $K$. Can we deduce that the there are finite number of $K$-rational points on the affine surface $D(zw)$ by Lang conjecture?

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ It seems that the components of the ramification locus are all rational. $\endgroup$ – Alex Degtyarev Mar 31 '14 at 6:03
  • $\begingroup$ What are the coordinates? $\endgroup$ – abx Mar 31 '14 at 6:06
  • $\begingroup$ if we homogenize the equation of the surface $S$ with respect to the variable $w$ it becomes of the form $(\frac{z}{w})^2 = P(\frac{x}{w})Q(\frac{y}{w})$ in $\mathbb{P}^3$ with coordinates $x, y, z, w$. More precisely, by hyperbolicity I mean the affine part of the surface $S$, i.e. the part $\{w\neq 0\}$ is hyperbolic. Equivalently the affine part of the surface $S$ doesn't contain any rational/elliptic curves. ( the image of any non constant meromorphic functions is contained in the part $\{w=0\}$. $\endgroup$ – Mehdi Mar 31 '14 at 10:16
  • $\begingroup$ Mehdi: can you explain the word "equivalently" in your question? I thought that equivalence of hyperbolicity to the absence of rational/elliptic curves is a major unsolved conjecture. $\endgroup$ – Alexandre Eremenko Mar 31 '14 at 13:17
  • $\begingroup$ Yes , Alexandre, this is one of the conjectures made by Lang $\endgroup$ – Mehdi Apr 1 '14 at 7:22
1
$\begingroup$

I am just writing as an answer the point raised by Alex Degtyarev in the comments: for every root $a_i$ of $P(x)$, resp. for every root $b_j$ of $Q(y)$, the surface contains the rational curve $\{(a_i,y,0):y\in \mathbb{C}\}$, resp. the rational curve $\{(x,b_j,0):x\in \mathbb{C}\}$.

Edit. The OP clarifies that the question is whether the Zariski open subset $D(z)$ is hyperbolic. This open subset is a finite, unbranched cover of the affine hyperbolic surfaces $$[\mathbb{C}\setminus Z(P(x))]\times [\mathbb{C}\setminus Z(Q(y))],$$ the product of two affine hyperbolic curves.

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ I guess that these are all kinds of rational curves in the surface $S$, it means that there is no rational/elliptic curve in the part $\{z\neq 0 \}\cup \{w\neq0\}$. $\endgroup$ – Mehdi Mar 31 '14 at 13:29
  • $\begingroup$ Just to clarify, are you amending your question to ask about hyperbolicity of the affine surface where $zw$ is nonzero? $\endgroup$ – Jason Starr Mar 31 '14 at 13:34
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, Jason, I ask about the hyperbolicity of the affine surface where $zw$ is nonzero. $\endgroup$ – Mehdi Mar 31 '14 at 13:47
  • $\begingroup$ This is a way of thinking about this problem: we can define the map $S \righarrow \mathbb{P}^1$ by $(x, y, z, w) \mapsto (x, y)$ which is defined everywhere except the finite set $\Sigma$ of the singularities of the surface $S$. This set can be blown up to yield a holomorphic map from the blowup of $S$, i.e. $g: \overline{S} \rightarrow \mathbb{P}^1$. Now if we could prove that the map $g$ can be factorized as $\overline{S} \rightarrow C \rightarrow \mathbb{P}^1$ where $C$ is a hyper elliptic curve, then we can almost prove the hyperbolicity of the surface $S$ by a standard argument. $\endgroup$ – Mehdi Mar 31 '14 at 13:55
  • $\begingroup$ Jason, you mean the Zariski open subset $D(zw)$? $\endgroup$ – Mehdi Mar 31 '14 at 17:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.