I recently worked through most of the proof of the rationality of the moduli of genus 3 curves, which seemed to have the following structure:

  1. Every nonhyperelliptic genus 3 curve is a smooth plane quartic.
  2. The plane quartics form a projective space.
  3. Apply GIT to this projective space and the $PGL(3)$ action.
  4. Prove that this quotient is rational.

I've seen somewhat similarly structured arguments before. So my question:

When is a GIT quotient rational?

In particular, are quotients of $\mathbb{P}^n$ by $PGL_k$ rational, under some reasonable hypotheses?

Are there any natural invariants that are preserved by quotients (again, with reasonable conditions, or of the above form)?

  • $\begingroup$ 1: every 'non-hyperelliptic' genus 3 curve is a smooth quartic. 3: that would be PGL(3), not PGL(4). $\endgroup$ – VA. Feb 22 '10 at 21:46
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is not an answer, but maybe helpful: Probably you have come across this yourself, but in case you have not, Chris Boehning's habilitation may be useful: uni-math.gwdg.de/boehning/invariant_theory_book.pdf $\endgroup$ – olli_jvn Feb 22 '10 at 22:23
  • $\begingroup$ @VA Thanks for the corrections. Is there a 2? $\endgroup$ – Charles Siegel Feb 23 '10 at 1:23

A useful general result is the 'no-name lemma' stating that when a reductive group $G$ acts linearly on two vector spaces $V$ and $W$ 'almost freely' (that is, the stabilizer subgroup of a general point is trivial), then the GIT-quotients $V/G$ and $W/G$ are stably rational (that is, $V/G \times \mathbb{C}^m$ and $W/G \times \mathbb{C}^n$ are birational for some $m$ and $n$).

Btw. Katsylo used it in the rationality of genus 3 curves you mentioned.

Clearly, the following implications hold:

rational $\implies$ stably rational $\implies$ unirational

and counterexamples to the other implications exist (Artin-Mumford for a unirational non-stably rational variety and Colliot-Thelene, Sansuc and Swinnerton-Dyer for a non-rational stably rational one).

As to $PGL_n$ : here the 'canonical' example of a vector space having an almost free $PGL_n$-action is couples of $n\times n$ matrices under simultaneous conjugation. Hence, by the NNL any other almost free GIT-quotient is stably rational to it.

Here the best result known is that when $n$ divides $420=2^2\times3\times5\times7$ then such quotients are stably rational. For couples of matrices under simultaneous conjugation rationality is known for $n\leq 4$ but even for the cases $n=5$ and $n=7$ only stably rationality is known. 'Retract rationality' (a lot weaker than stable rationality) is known for all square-free $n$ by a result of David Saltman.


There is a very nice (if somewhat dated - it predates Katsylo's work of M3) survey of the problem by Dolgachev in the AG Bowdoin volume. Here is the google books link.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.