Does the following 'alternating' Euler product, with $p_n$ the $n$-th prime number, converge for $\Re(s)>0$ ?

$$\displaystyle \prod_{n=1}^\infty \left( \dfrac{1}{1-\frac{1}{p_{n}^{s}}} \right)^{(-1)^n}$$

Based on numerical evidence, I dare to conjecture that this is indeed the case (note that I could not find any zeros), but keen to find approaches towards a proof. Note that I also tried other triggers than $n$ to 'flip the factors', like for instance prime congruence to either $p_n \pmod 6 =1$ or $5$ and $p_n \pmod 4 =1$ or $3$. Even tried the Möbius function $\mu(n)$ as the exponent of $(-1)$, but did not observe any convergence in the domain $\Re(s)\le 1$. So, using $n$ to flip any other prime factor, seems a delicate choice to make convergence work or fail in this domain.


This question loosely builds on: Equality of an alternating infinite product and an infinite sum


Taking logarithms, we arrive at the sum

$$-\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (-1)^n \log(1-p_n^{-s}).$$ For $Re(s)>1/k$, we can approximate the logarithm with its taylor series to $2k+1$ terms with an error of $o(p_n^{-2})$ which converges absolutely. Thus, it suffices to show that for each $s>0$, the sum

$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (-1)^n p_n^{-s}$$ converges. To do this, we estimate

$$p_{2n}^{-s}-p_{2n+1}^{-s} = s^{-1}\int_{p_{2n}}^{p_{2n+1}} x^{-1-s} dx = O_s(G_{2n}\cdot p_{2n}^{-1-s})$$ where we define $G_n= p_{n+1}-p_n$.

Now note that by the PNT we have $p_n\sim n\log n$ and $\displaystyle\sum_{n=X}^{2X-1} G_n = p_{2X}-p_X \sim X\log X$.

\begin{align*} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (-1)^n p_n^{-s}&=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (p_{2n}^{-s}-p_{2n+1}^{-s})\\ &\ll_s \sum_n G_{2n}\cdot p_{2n}^{-1-s}\\ &< \sum_n G_n \cdot p_n^{-1-s}\\ &\ll \sum_{m=0}^{\infty} \sum_{n=2^m}^{2^{m+1}-1} G_n (m2^m)^{-1-s}\\ &\ll \sum_{m=0}^{\infty} (m2^m)^{-s}\\ \end{align*}

Which converges for $s>0$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Many thanks, Jacob. I honestly had not expected a proof being within reach at all. Does this also immediately prove the similar convergence of $\prod_{n=1}^\infty \left( \dfrac{1}{1-\frac{1}{n^{s}}} \right)^{(-1)^n}$, since the first two steps in your proof would be similar and lead to proving that $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (-1)^n n^{-s}$ (i.e. the Dirichlet Eta-function) converges for $\Re(s) > 0$ (which already has been proven)? $\endgroup$ – Agno Mar 6 '14 at 18:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yup. In fact, you can prove $$\prod_{n=1}^{\infty}(1-a_n^{-s})^{(-1)^n}$$ converges for $Re(s)>0$ for any increasing sequence of positive integers $a_n$ this way. The PNT thing I used was overkill. $\endgroup$ – jacob Mar 9 '14 at 6:57
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks and understood. For the alternating prime product, I had of course hoped for convergence to known constants or to find some new zeros, but did not find any. However, for the alternating product over integers: $\prod_{n=1}^\infty \left( \dfrac{1}{1-\frac{1}{n^{s}}} \right)^{(-1)^n}$, there are a few interesting outcomes. E.g. $s=1$ gives $\frac{\pi}{2}$ and $s=2$ yields $\frac{\pi^2}{8}$. I guess there also exist more complicated closed forms for $s=3,4,5...$. $\endgroup$ – Agno Mar 9 '14 at 17:40

As Jacob mentioned, the question comes down to the conditional convergence of $\sum p^{-s}(-1)^n$ (for essentially the reason that $\prod(1-x)$ converges and is nonzero if $\sum x$ converges and $\sum x^2$ absolutely converges.

Now, if you look in Titchmarsh's Theory of Functions, there is a theorem that the region of conditional convergence of a Dirichlet series is a half plane (along with part of its boundary). This is proven by showing that convergence at some $s$ gives convergence on every wedge with vertex at $s$ and otherwise strictly to the right.

Thus since the series converges for every real $x>0$ (alternating series), it also converges in the right half plane.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Combine two consecutive terms as follows: $$ \left(1-\frac{1}{p_{2k}^s}\right)\left(1-\frac{1}{p_{2k+1}^s}\right)^{-1} = \frac{p_{2k+1}^s(p_{2k}^s-1)}{p_{2k}^s(p_{2k+1}^s-1)} = 1+\frac{p_{2k+1}^s-p_{2k}^s}{p_{2k}^s(p_{2k+1}^s-1)} $$ Since $\sum\frac{1}{p_{2k}}=\infty$ the sum in product in question tends to $\infty$ as $s\rightarrow\frac{1}{2}$ from the right. Hence the product does not converge for any $s\in[0, \frac{1}{2}]$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Note that the numerator $p_{2k+1}^{s}-p_{2k}^s$ can also be small. I don't think what you say holds. $\endgroup$ – Lucia Mar 6 '14 at 15:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.