8
$\begingroup$

Let $T$ be an Aronszajn-tree, $C\subset \omega_1$ a club set and $f:\bigcup\limits_{\alpha\in C}T_\alpha\longrightarrow \mathbb Q$ a strictly increasing function (where $T_\alpha$ is the $\alpha$-level of $T$). Is $T$ special (i.e. there exists such an $f$ defined on the whole $T$)?

I suspect that this is true and that it is a known fact, but I have not found any reference.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Nice question! It is clear at least that there can be $f$ defined on $T|C$ that do not extend to $T$. For example, perhaps $f$ is $0$ on the root, and $f$ is defined on $T_\omega$ in such a way that there are extensions of the node $0$ and of $1$ with arbitrarily small values by $f$. In this case, there is no way to extend $f$ to define $f(0)$ and $f(1)$. $\endgroup$ Mar 6, 2014 at 0:30
  • $\begingroup$ @JoelDavidHamkins Certainly, it does not seem trivial to me. However, in his book "Proper and improper forcing", VII 3.20, Shelah says: "The small gain is that we directly find a function specializing $T$ rather than finding one specializing a closed unbounded set of levels, and then using a theorem saying this is equivalent". But I cannot find a proof or a reference of that theorem in the book or elsewhere. $\endgroup$
    – Carlos
    Mar 6, 2014 at 1:24

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

This is a classic result that I learned by reading The Souslin Problem by Devlin and Johnsbråten (Lecture Notes in Mathematics 405).

First, recall that another way to think of special trees is that they are the $\omega_1$-trees that admit a cover by countably many antichains. Suppose $C = \{\gamma_\alpha:\alpha\lt\omega_1\}$ is closed unbounded with $\gamma_0 = 0$ and that $\bigcup_{\alpha\lt\omega_1} T(\gamma_\alpha) = \bigcup_{n\lt\omega} A_n$ where each $A_n$ is an antichain. For $t \in T(\gamma_\alpha)$ let $\{t_m : m \lt \omega\}$ be the set of extensions of $t$ with height less than $\gamma_{\alpha+1}$. Observe that each $B_{m,n} = \{t_m : t \in A_n\}$ is an antichain in $T$ and $T = \bigcup_{m,n\lt\omega} B_{m,n}$.

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.