Are all vector bundles on a given vector bundle the pull back of a vector bundle on the base?

In more detail: let $X$ be a space and $p:E\rightarrow X$ a vector bundle over $X$. Let $\iota: X \rightarrow E$ denote the inclusion given by the zero section. Then for $V$ a vector bundle over $E$, we have the restriction $\iota^* V$ a vector bundle over $X$, while for $W$ vector bundle over $X$ we can consider the pull back $p^*V$ to $E$. On one hand, it is straightforward that $\iota^* p^* W = W$.

When is it true that $p^* \iota^* V$ is isomorphic to $V$? (so that any vector bundle on $E$ is the pull back of a vector bundle on the base)

Clearly the question depends on which setting we are in.

For $X$ a topological space and $E$ a topological vector bundle this is clearly true, since $\iota\circ p$ is homotopic to the identity in $E$. This can be shown using the classifying space for vector bundles and the fact that homotopic maps give the same vector bundle.

For $X$ a manifold and $E$ a smooth vector bundle this is true as well, using the fact that they are isomorphic at the topological level.

What happens in the holomorphic and algebraic setting? Say $X$ a complex manifold, $E$ a holomorphic vector bundle and considering the vector bundles $V$ and $p^*\iota^* V$ up to equivalence of holomorphic vector bundles. Or $X$ a smooth algebraic variety (over $\mathbb{C}$ if needed), $E$ and algebraic vector bundle and equivalence of algebraic vector bundles.

I thought it had to be true, but then I realized that for $X$ equal to a point (in the algebraic setting) this is Quillen-Suslin theorem, so that one need to be more cautious...

Another remark: for $V$ of rank one this is true in both complex and algebraic setting, since there is an isomorphism between the Chow groups of $X$ and $E$.


2 Answers 2


This is definitely false in the algebraic or holomorphic setting, even in dimension 1. There is a well-known example (see this post) of a rank 2 vector bundle $E$ on $\mathbb{C}\times \mathbb{P}^1$ such that $E_{|\{t\}\times \mathbb{P}^1 }=\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^1}^2$ for $t\neq 0$, but $E_{|\{0\}\times \mathbb{P}^1}=\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^1}(-1)\oplus \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^1}(1)$. Such a bundle cannot be the pull back of a bundle on $\mathbb{P}^1$.


Swan's paper "On Seminormality" shows that whenever the ring $R$ fails to be seminormal, there is an algebraic counterexample with $X=Spec(R)$, $E$ trivial and rank one over $X$, and $V$ rank one over $E$.

Seminormality means that whenever $b^2=c^3\in R$, it follows that $b=a^3,c=a^2$ for some $a\in R$. In particular, the coordinate ring of the cusp $k[X^2,X^3]$ (where $k$ is, say, any field) is not seminormal.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Gubeladze sharpens this, in the toric setting: he shows that Quillen-Suslin holds for not-necessarily-normal toric varieties iff they are seminormal. $\endgroup$ Mar 5, 2014 at 0:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.