I already asked this question on MSE but didn't get any comment or answer, so I ask it here.

Assuming countability conjecture as stated in http://www.mat.unimi.it/users/molteni/research/papers-pdf/4-molteni-Linear_independence_in_the_Selberg_class.pdf and degree conjecture for the whole Selberg class $\mathcal{S}$, one can associate to any element $F$ of $\mathcal{S}$ a positive integer $n(F)$ such that:

i) $n(s\mapsto 1)=1$
ii) $n(F)$ is prime if and only if $F$ is a primitive element of $\mathcal{S}$ of positive degree
iii) $n(F)=n(G)$ if and only if $F=G$
iv) $n(F)$ is prime and $d$ is the least $k$ such that $\pi^{(k)}(n(F))$ is composite if and only if $F$ is primitive of degree $d$ ($d$ will be called the arithmetical degree of $n(F)$)
v) $n(F.G)=n(F).n(G)$

Then, using $deg(F.G)=deg(F)+deg(G)$ one can define the arithmetical degree of $n(F)$ where $F$ is any element of $\mathcal{S}$ as the degree of $F$. Doing this, the Selberg class would be, always assuming the aforementioned conjectures, in a one-to-one correspondence with the set of the positive integers. But the fundamental theorem of arithmetic says that every positive integer greater than $1$ is the product in a unique fashion of prime numbers up to the order. So would the considered "isomorphism" between $\mathcal{S}$ and $\mathbb{Z}_{>0}$ show that the countability conjecture together with the degree conjecture imply that every element of the Selberg class factors in a unique fashion in a product of primitive elements up to the order? Thanks in advance.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.