4
$\begingroup$

If $ A $ and $ B $ are $ C^{*} $-algebras, then they are strongly Morita equivalent if there exist a $ (B,A) $-bimodule $ E $ and an $ (A,B) $-bimodule $ F $ such that $$ E \otimes_{A} F \cong B \quad \text{and} \quad F \otimes_{B} E \cong A, $$ where the isomorphisms are between $ (B,B) $-bimodules and between $ (A,A) $-bimodules respectively. All bimodules are meant to be Hilbert bimodules.

I was wondering:

Question. If two $ C^{*} $-algebras are strongly Morita equivalent and one knows the bimodules that implement the strong Morita equivalence, then does there exist a morphism between the $ C^{*} $-algebras that can be defined using the bimodules?

I thank everyone in advance for their help.

$\endgroup$
7
$\begingroup$

Well, here is a remarkable theorem of Brown-Rieffel-Green:

If $A,B$ are $\sigma$-unital and stable, then they are strong Morita equivalent iff they are isomorphic.

However,if they are not stable, there may not be a morphism, as $\mathbb{C},\mathbb{K}$ are strongly Morita equivalent via the Hilbert space $\mathbb{H}$, but there is no good map for us, nor it is reasonable to expect a map to be constructed via $\mathbb{H}$.

Something trivial can be $A,B$, $B$ stable, $\sigma$-unital, and $B$ stable, then $A$ has a map to $A\otimes \mathbb{K}$, by $a\rightarrow a\otimes p $, where $p$ is a rank one projection,$A\otimes \mathbb{K}$ is isomorphic to $B\otimes \mathbb{K} \cong B$ by the previous theorem.

$\endgroup$
8
$\begingroup$

You cannot says anything about morphisms between $A$ and $B$ in general, but from the two bi-modules you can construct a third algebra $C$, such that both $A$ and $B$ embeds into $C$ with the embeddings inducing Morita equivalence between $A$ and $C$ and $B$ and $C$ compatible with the equivalence between $A$ and $B$. The algebra $C$ is constructed as an algebra of $2\times2$ matrices, with diagonals coefficient in $A$ and $B$ and non diagonal coefficient in the two bi-modules.

You will find details about this for example in Blackadar "Operator algebras" II.7, especially II.7.6.9

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.