Let $g\geq 2$, and $$\mathcal T=\{(t_1,\cdots,t_{2g+2})~|~t_i\neq t_j,\forall i\neq j\}.$$ For any $t=(t_1,\cdots,t_{2g+2})\in \mathcal T$, let $$Y_t=\left\{y^2=\prod_{i=1}^{2g+2}(x-t_i)\right\}.$$ Thus we get a family of hyperelliptic curves $\mathcal Y \to \mathcal T$. Let $t^0=(t_1^0,\cdots,t_{2g+2}^0) \in \mathcal T$ be a fixed point (we assume $t_i^0\neq 0,\forall i$). Then we have the Kodaira-Spencer map $$\Theta_{\mathcal T,t^0} \longrightarrow H^1(Y_{t^0}, \Theta_{Y_{t^0}}).$$ Take dual, we get a map (also called Kodiara-Spencer map): $$\kappa:H^0(Y_{t^0}, \omega^{\otimes 2}_{Y_{t^0}}) \longrightarrow \Omega^1_{\mathcal T,t^0}.$$ Now one can take $$\frac{x^i}{y^2}(dx)^2, 0\leq i \leq 2(g-1);~ \frac{x^j}{y}(dx)^2, 0\leq j \leq g-3,$$ as a basis of $H^0(Y_{t^0}, \omega^{\otimes 2}_{Y_{t^0}})$. And take $$dt_1, \cdots, dt_{2g+2},$$ as a basis of $\Omega^1_{\mathcal T,t^0}$. Then can we write down the Kodaira-Spencer map explicitly under the above two basis?

  • $\begingroup$ I don't know the answer off the top of my head, but you might look in some of the classical books on algebraic curves; it's probably treated in some such treatise. One thing does seem clear: You won't need the quadratic differentials that are odd with respect to the hyperelliptic involution $(x,y)\to (x,-y)$; indeed, $\kappa$ will only involve the differentials $x^i(dx/y)^2$, since these are a basis for the cotangent space to the $(2g{-}1)$-dimensional hyperelliptic locus $\mathcal{H}_g$ within the $(3g{-}3)$-dimensional moduli space $\mathcal{M}_g$ of all curves of genus $g$. $\endgroup$ – Robert Bryant Feb 7 '14 at 20:30
  • $\begingroup$ @Robert Bryant Thank you very much. I don't know any book treating this special problem. Do you have any good reference to this problem? $\endgroup$ – Pyramid Feb 10 '14 at 11:46
  • $\begingroup$ Already asked (more or less): mathoverflow.net/questions/22345/… $\endgroup$ – Qfwfq Feb 11 '14 at 18:06
  • $\begingroup$ @Qfwfq: But the answer there is not very explicit... $\endgroup$ – Robert Bryant Feb 11 '14 at 18:20
  • $\begingroup$ @RobertBryant: indeed I said 'already asked', not 'already answered' :-) In fact, your answer below is very explicit. $\endgroup$ – Qfwfq Feb 12 '14 at 14:15

Caution: I was thinking over the calculation that led to my proposed answer below, and I realized that I had neglected a term that I haven't actually justified as being zero, so now I'm less sure that these formulae are correct. There may be another term in the formula for $\kappa(\phi_i)$ and I don't see how to rule it out. As a result, I am withdrawing my answer until I have had time to determine whether the extra term really does vanish. My apologies to those who trusted my claim and up-voted it!

Unfortunately, I am not allowed to delete an 'accepted answer', so I'm putting this caution at the top so that readers will know not to regard it as correct (yet).

I haven't checked all of the details, but I think that the following is correct and gives you a basis for an answer: We can get rid of the action of the Möbius group of linear fractional transformations, by, instead, looking at the manifold $$ \mathcal{S} = \{(s_0,\ldots,s_{2g-2})\ |\ s_i\not=0,1\ \text{and}\ s_i\not=s_j\ \text{when}\ i\not=j \ \}\subset \mathbb{C}^{2g-1} $$ and letting $s\in\mathcal{S}$ correspond to the genus $g$ hyperelliptic curve $C_s$ defined by $$ y^2 = x(x-1)(x-s_0)(x-s_1)\cdots(x-s_{2g-2}). $$ The hyperelliptic involution is $\iota(x,y) = (x,-y)$. A basis for the $\iota$-even holomorphic quadratic differentials on $C_s$ (a space of dimension $2g-1$ when $g>1$) is given by $$ \frac{x^i\ dx^2}{x(x-1)(x-s_0)(x-s_1)\cdots(x-s_{2g-2})}\ \text{when}\ 0\le i\le 2g-2, $$ and a basis for the $\iota$-odd holomorphic quadratic differentials on $C_s$ (a space of dimension $g-2$ when $g>1$) is given by $$ \psi_j = \frac{x^i\ dx^2}{y}\qquad\text{when}\ 0\le j\le g-3. $$ It turns out that a more convenient basis for the $\iota$-even holomorphic quadratic differentials is $$ \phi_i = \frac{dx^2}{x(x-1)(x-s_i)}\qquad \text{when}\ 0\le i\le 2g-2. $$

Then, it seems, in this case, that the (dual) Kodaira-Spencer map is given by $$ \kappa(\psi_j) = 0\qquad \text{when}\ 0\le j\le g-3 $$ while there is a (nonzero) constant $c$ (which might depend on $g$, but I don't think so) such that $$ \kappa(\phi_i) = \frac{c\ ds_i}{s_i(s_i-1)}\qquad \text{when}\ 0\le i\le 2g-2. $$ (This formula even works when $g=1$, by the way.)

I think you can get your desired formula by making this equivariant with respect to the action of the Möbius group $\mathrm{PSL}(2,\mathbb{C})$, but I suspect that the general formula in this case won't be particularly nice.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. I wonder how could you get the formula? $$\kappa(\phi_i)=\frac{cds_i}{s_i(s_i-1)}.$$ $\endgroup$ – Pyramid Feb 12 '14 at 11:10
  • $\begingroup$ My calculation is based on Example 1 (starting at the bottom of page 39 and continuing to the top of page 41) of Complex Manifolds by Morrow and Kodaira (first edition, 1971). I used their ideas as a guide, but I had to change the notation a bit and adapt their arguments. Assuming that I did the calculations correctly (and there was a normalizing constant that I wasn't sure about, hence $c$), the above is the answer that this yields. $\endgroup$ – Robert Bryant Feb 12 '14 at 12:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.