I've been thinking about the following situation. I have schemes $X$ and $Y$, smooth of dimension $n$ over a base scheme $S$, together with sections of the structure maps, which are closed embeddings of $S$ into $X$ and $Y$. Suppose I have an isomorphism of the formal completions of $X$ and $Y$ with respect to $S$. I would like to know if this implies that I can find a third $S$-scheme $U$, together with a section $S \hookrightarrow U$ and morphisms $U \to X$, $U \to Y$ over $S$ which are etale and compatible with the closed embeddings.

In the case that $S$ is a point, this comes down to the statement that if I have an isomorphism of the completions of the local rings of points $x$ in $X$ and $y$ in $Y$, then there exists a common etale neighbourhood $(U,u)$ of $(X,x)$ and $(Y,y)$. This is a corollary of Artin's Approximation Theorem (Corollary 2.6 in "Algebraic approximation of structures over complete local rings"), but I am having trouble generalising his proof to the relative situation, and thought I should check if it is already known to experts.

  • The global sections might cause problems. Are you allowing to base change by an 'etale cover of $S$? – Jason Starr Jan 23 '14 at 14:28
  • 2
    Artin's result in the case of formal completion at a point doesn't require any smoothness hypothesis. By using Popescu's generalization of Artin approximation, the proof adapts to work etale-locally on $S$ (to get a common pointed etale neighborhood when there's a common point-completion over one on $S$) if $S$ is excellent. But in the smooth case, at least Zariski-locally, can't we just take $U$ to be the fiber square of etale maps of $X$ and $Y$ to an affine space (respecting sections), avoiding Artin approximation entirely? – user76758 Jan 23 '14 at 14:58
  • 1
    You might want to have look at Corollary 5.4 in this paper: J. Wildeshaus, The boundary motive: definition and basic properties, Compositio Math. 142 (2006), 631-656 (also available as arXiv:math/0408295). – Denis-Charles Cisinski Jan 27 '14 at 12:55

ALERT. I was alerted to a problem with the following by an e-mail. Unlike the affine case, in the global case, the formal completion of a smooth $S$-scheme along a section may fail to split. Thus, in the examples of $X$ and $Y$ below, the formal completions may be non-isomorphic. In fact, likely they are non-isomorphic. So the following example is probably wrong.

There cannot be a "global" result in complete generality, but there certainly can be results that are "local" over $S$. Here is one global counterexample. Let $S$ be $\mathbb{P}^1$. Let $Z$ be $S\times S$, and let $\Delta:S \to Z$ be the diagonal morphism. Let $(\pi:X\to Z,\chi:Z\to X)$ be the vector bundle of rank $1$ such that $\chi^*\mathcal{O}_X(\chi(Z))$ is isomorphic to $\text{pr}_1^*\mathcal{O}_S(0)\otimes \text{pr}_2^*\mathcal{O}_S(2)$ as an invertible sheaf on $Z=S\times S$. Similarly, let $(\rho:Y\to Z,\upsilon:Z\to Y)$ be the vector bundle of rank $1$ such that $\upsilon^*\mathcal{O}_Y(\upsilon(Z))$ is isomorphic to $\text{pr}_1^*\mathcal{O}_S(1)\otimes \text{pr}_2^*\mathcal{O}_S(1)$.

Via the projection $\text{pr}_1:Z\to S$, both the $Z$-schemes $X$ and $Y$ are also $S$-schemes. Define $\chi':S\to X$ and $\upsilon':S\to Y$ to be $\chi\circ \Delta$, respectively $\upsilon\circ \Delta$. The point is that every nonempty, effective Cartier divisor in $X$, respectively $Y$, has nonempty intersection with $\chi'(S)$, respectively with $\upsilon'(S)$.

Let $f:U\to X$ be an étale morphism such that $\chi':S\to X$ lifts to $\chi'':S\to U$ with $f\circ \chi'' = \chi'$. There exists a quasi-compact, separated, connected, Zariski open subset of $U$ containing $\chi''(S)$. Thus, without loss of generality, assume that $U$ is quasi-compact, separated and connected. By Grothendieck's formulation of Zariski's Main Theorem (or more explicit arguments), $f$ factors as an open immersion, $i:U\to \overline{U}$, composed with a finite morphism, $\overline{f}:\overline{U}\to X$, where $\overline{U}$ is normal. But then, by purity, the branch divisor of $\overline{f}$ is an effective Cartier divisor. Since $\chi'$ lifts to $\chi''$, $\chi'(S)$ is disjoint from the branch divisor. But then, by the previous paragraph, the branch divisor is empty. Thus $\overline{f}$ is everywhere étale. But, since $X$ has trivial étale fundamental group, this implies that $\overline{f}$ is an isomorphism. Therefore $f:U\to X$ is an open immersion.

The same argument holds for $Y$. So for a pair $(\sigma:U\to S,\tau:S\to U)$, if there exist étale $S$-morphisms, $f_X:U\to X$ and $f_Y:U\to Y$ compatible with $\chi'$, $\upsilon'$ and $\tau$, then, up to shrinking $U$, both $f_X$ and $f_Y$ are open immersions. Moreover, since the complement of $U$ in $X$, respectively $Y$, is disjoint from $\chi'(S)$, respectively $\upsilon'(S)$, the complement has codimension $2$. Thus $X$ and $Y$ are $S$-isomorphic away from codimension $2$.

Now this is a serious problem. An isomorphism away from codimension $2$ induces an isomorphism of Picard groups and of the classes of the dualizing sheaf inside the Picard groups. By construction, the pullback map $\pi^*:\text{Pic}(Z)\to \text{Pic}(X)$, respectively $\rho^*$, is an isomorphism. The isomorphism of Picard groups of $X$ and $Y$ induced from this $S$-isomorphism is compatible with these pullback isomorphisms. Also $\omega_X$ is isomorphic to $$\pi^* ( \text{pr}_1^*\mathcal{O}_S(-2)\otimes \text{pr}_2^*\mathcal{O}_S(-4)),$$ whereas $\omega_Y$ is isomorphic to $$\pi^*(\text{pr}_1^*\mathcal{O}_S(-3)\otimes \text{pr}_2^*\mathcal{O}_S(-3)).$$ This contradiction proves that there cannot be a pair $(f_X,f_Y)$ as above.

Finally, I claim that the formal completions of $X$ and $Y$ along the image of $S$ are isomorphic. First of all, the normal sheaf of $S$ in $X$, respectively of $S$ in $Y$, fits into a short exact sequence, $$ 0 \to \Delta^*N_{\Delta(S)/Z}\to \chi^*N_{\chi(S)/X} \to \chi^*N_{Z/X} \to 0,$$ respectively, $$ 0 \to \Delta^*N_{\Delta(S)/Z}\to \upsilon^*N_{\upsilon(S)/Y} \to \upsilon^*N_{Z/Y} \to 0.$$ Of course, in both cases this is just, $$ 0 \to \mathcal{O}_S(2) \to \mathcal{O}_S(2)^{\oplus 2} \to \mathcal{O}_S(2) \to 0. $$ So the normal sheaves are isomorphic. But also, the infinitesimal extensions are trivial since there is a retraction induced by the projections to $S$.

Edit. I realized that there is an easier example underlying the example above. Again let $S$ be $\mathbb{P}^1$. Now let $X$ be the $S$-scheme $S\times S$ via the first projection, $\text{pr}_1$, and let the section $\chi$ be the diagonal morphism. Next, let $(\rho:Y\to S, \upsilon:S\to Y)$ be the rank $1$ vector bundle over $S$ with $\upsilon^*\mathcal{O}_Y(\upsilon(S))$ isomorphic to $\mathcal{O}_S(2)$, and where $\upsilon$ is the zero section. These $S$-schemes with section are formally isomorphic as above. However, every nonempty, effective Cartier divisor in $S\times S$ intersects the diagonal $\chi(S)$. Thus, as in the above example, there is no $S$-scheme with section $(\sigma:U\to S,\tau:S\to U)$ and pair of étale $S$-morphisms, $f_X:U\to X$, $f_Y:U\to Y$ that is compatible with $\chi$, $\upsilon$, and $\tau$.

  • I don't buy the argument that the curve misses the branch locus downstairs because branching could happen at other points upstairs. – answer_bot Jan 24 '14 at 2:35
  • @answer_bot: We do have the Lemma of Enriques-Severi-Zariski telling us that the inverse image of a (proper) ample divisor is connected. That takes care of the second example directly, but it also applies indirectly to the first example: the image of $S$ is an "ample complete intersection", rather than an ample divisor. – Jason Starr Jan 24 '14 at 4:03

Your Answer

 
discard

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.