19
$\begingroup$

Here's a question that has come up in a couple of talks that I have given recently.

The 'classical' way to show that there is a knot $K$ that is locally-flat slice in the 4-ball but not smoothly slice in the 4-ball is to do two things

  1. Compute that the Alexander polynomial of $K$ is 1, and so by results of Freedman's you know that $K$ is locally-flat slice.

  2. (due to Rudolph) Somehow obtain a special diagram of $K$ (or utilize a more subtle argument) to show that you can present $K$ as a separating curve on a minimal Seifert surface for a torus knot. Since we know (by various proofs, the first due to Kronheimer-Mrowka) that the genus of torus knot is equal to its smooth 4-ball genus (part of Milnor's conjecture), the smooth 4-ball genus of $K$ must be equal to the genus of the piece of the torus knot Seifert surface that it bounds, and this is $\geq 1$.

Boiling the approach of 2. down to braid diagrams, you come up with the slice-Bennequin inequality.

Well, here's the thing. I have this smooth cobordism from the torus knot to $K$, and then I know that $K$ bounds a locally-flat disc. This means that the locally-flat 4-ball genus of the torus knot must be less than its smooth 4-ball genus. So if you were to conjecture that the locally flat 4-ball genus of a torus knot agrees with its smooth 4-ball genus, you would be wrong.

My question is - are there any conjectures out there on the torus knot locally-flat genus? Even asymptotically? Any results? Any way known to try and study this?

Thanks, Andrew.

$\endgroup$

3 Answers 3

11
$\begingroup$

Related to the early investigation of the Thom conjecture,the G-signature thm was used circa 1970 to give 4-ball genus bounds for torus knots which asyptocically (in some cases) were a fixed fraction of what we now know to be the smooth category answer. I belive Larry Tayor observed (in the '70s or early 80s) that these G-signature bounds hold in the topologically flat world as well. Thus, I believe, there there are families of torus knots where the the flat-4-ball geunus is known to be at least some known fraction of the smooth 4-ball genus. Sorry I don't have the references at hand.

$\endgroup$
7
$\begingroup$

I realize the following answer comes somewhat belated.

Rudolph worked on this (Some topologically locally-flat surfaces in the complex projective plane), and more recently Baader, Feller, Liechti and myself (https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.07634).

Here is a brief summary of what is known:

Levine-Tristram signatures give a lower bound for the topological 4-genus of torus knots, which is asymptotically equal to half of their 3-genus. This is the best we have; other methods, like Casson-Gordon invariants or $L^2$-signatures, might give better bounds, but they have not been computed for torus knots.

Upper bounds may be obtained by the "algebraic genus": constructing locally flat slice surface by ambient surgery, using Freedman's result that Alexander-polynomial-1 knots are topologically slice. In this way, one can prove that for small (3-genus $\leq$ 14) torus knots, the topological 4-genus equals the maximum of the Levine-Tristram signatures. In particular, for the examples Ian mentions, one has $g_4^t(T(3,7))=g_4^t(T(4,5))=5$. More generally, for $p<q$ one has $g_4^t(T(p,q)) < g_3(T(p,q))$ unless $p=2$ or $(p,q)\in\{(3,4),(3,5)\}$.

With the same method, one finds that asymptotically, the topological 4-genus of large torus knots is at most three quarters of their 3-genus.

Feeling adventurous, one could conjecture that for all torus knots, the topological 4-genus equals the maximum of the Levine-Tristram signatures.

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

The signature/2 gives a lower bound on the 4-ball genus. Looking through a table of torus knots, the first ones I found where the smooth genus is > signature/2 were T(7,3), T(5,4). I don't remember the example from your talk, but can you show that these ones have smaller topological genus? It's possible that there are better lower estimates on the 4-genus coming from other sorts of signatures.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.