3
$\begingroup$

Suppose we are given a finite dimensional $k$-algebra $A$ with an action of a finite group $G$. Suppose $\mathrm{gldim}(A)$ is finite. What is the relation between $\mathrm{gldim}(A)$ and $\mathrm{gldim}(A^G)$ ? Is $\mathrm{gldim}(A^G)$ finite too ?

Such algebras occur for example when on considers a smooth projective variety over $k$ with an action of a finite group $G$. If $X$ has a $G$-equivariant tilting bundle $\mathcal{T}$ then $\mathrm{End}_G(\mathcal{T})=\mathrm{End}(\mathcal{T})^G$ would be such an $k$-algebra as above...

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ I am guessing from context that when you say that $A$ is a "finite dimensional $k$-algebra", what you mean is that $A$ is finite dimensional as a $k$-vector space, not that $A$ has finite Krull dimension. $\endgroup$ Jan 19, 2014 at 13:32

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

If $k$ has prime characteristic dividing $|G|$ then there are natural examples where $\operatorname{gldim}(A^G)=\infty$.

For example, let $A=\operatorname{End}_k(kG)$ be the ring of linear endomorphisms of the regular $kG$-module, which is a matrix ring over $k$ and so has global dimension zero, and let $G$ act by conjugation. Then $A^G=\operatorname{End}_{kG}(kG)\cong kG$, which has infinite global dimension.

And here's an example where $\operatorname{char}(k)$ doesn't divide $|G|$.

Let $k$ be any field with characteristic different from two. Let $A$ be the path algebra of the quiver with two vertices and one arrow in each direction between the two vertices (call the arrows $a$ and $b$), modulo the relation $ab=0$. So $A$ is five-dimensional, with basis $\{e,f,a,b,ba\}$, where $e$ and $f$ are orthogonal idempotents, $ea=a=af$, $fb=b=be$. The global dimension of $A$ is two.

Let $G$ be a cyclic group of order two, where a generator acts on $A$ by fixing $e$ and $f$, and multiplying $a$ and $b$ by $-1$.

Then $A^G$ has basis $\{e,f,ba\}$, and is isomorphic to $k[x]/(x^2)\times k$ (where $x=ba$), which has infinite global dimension.

$\endgroup$
11
  • $\begingroup$ Shucks, you beat me to it. $\endgroup$ Jan 19, 2014 at 15:07
  • $\begingroup$ @JasonStarr : And I gave you an hour's head start, too! :-) $\endgroup$ Jan 19, 2014 at 15:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @abx: I've edited my answer to add an example where $\operatorname{char}(k)$ is prime to $|G|$. $\endgroup$ Jan 19, 2014 at 17:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JasonStarr: Yes, that's true. A Maschke-like proof shows that for any (right) $A^G$-module $M$, the natural $A^G$-module map $M\to M\otimes_{A^G}A$ is a split embedding. If $A$ is semisimple, then $M\otimes_{A^G}A$ (and hence $M$) is projective. $\endgroup$ Jan 20, 2014 at 10:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ And there's a paper of George Bergman (Groups acting on hereditary rings. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 23 (1971), 70-82) that proves that if $A$ is hereditary and $|G|$ is invertible in $A$, then $A^G$ is also hereditary. $\endgroup$ Jan 20, 2014 at 10:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.