8
$\begingroup$

A set of reals $X$ is strong measure zero if for any sequence of positive real numbers $ ( \epsilon_n ) _{n \in \omega }$ there is a sequence of open intervals $ ( a_n ) _{n \in \omega }$ which covers $X$ and such that each $ a_i $ has length less than $ \epsilon _i $.

Does anyone know where can I find a proof that the selection principle $\mathcal S_1(\mathcal O,\mathcal O)$ implies Borel property of strong measure zero? I have seen this in The Combinatorics of open covers, but the reference there is to an article which is not in English. Thank you,

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ What is the Borel property of strong measure zero? What is the reference that is not in English? $\endgroup$ – Goldstern Jan 16 '14 at 22:47
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The proof is very short, actually: given the sequence $\epsilon_i$, let $\mathcal{U}_i$ be the cover of $X$ by open intervals of length $\epsilon_i$. Then $\mathcal{S}_1(\mathcal{O},\mathcal{O})$ ensures that there is a cover of $X$ consisting of (at most) one member of each $\mathcal{U}_i$. A more general statement is proved in Theorem 9 in "Finite powers of strong measure zero sets" by M. Scheepers. $\endgroup$ – Mathieu Baillif Jan 17 '14 at 13:05
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Baillif's answer is correct and complete. Is there a reason why this question appears in MO as unanswered? $\endgroup$ – Boaz Tsaban Apr 28 '14 at 1:00
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you all for your comments. The answer is very clear. but, I don't know how to mark it as answered. If anyone could please mark it. Thank you! $\endgroup$ – Student Apr 30 '14 at 12:18
  • $\begingroup$ @Student: Checkmark the answer below. $\endgroup$ – Boaz Tsaban Aug 17 '15 at 21:54
2
$\begingroup$

To help with @Student's last comment, I post here Baillif's answer.

The proof is very short, actually: given the sequence $\epsilon_i$, let $U_i$ be the cover of $X$ by open intervals of length $\epsilon_i$. Then $S_1(O,O)$ ensures that there is a cover of $X$ consisting of (at most) one member of each $U_i$. A more general statement is proved in Theorem 9 in "Finite powers of strong measure zero sets" by M. Scheepers.

– Mathieu Baillif

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.