My question is, that given a vector field only numerically discrete in space, is there a way to estimate its vector potential?
Theoretically, I see this which requires the vector field over all of $\mathbb{R}^3$. Further, I also see Will Jagy's answer using Poincare's lemma which I like much more. But in this case I still need to know the entire vector field from $(0,0,0)$ to the point $(x,y,z)$ where I want to estimate the vector potential because of $t\in(0,1)$. Better than $\mathbb{R}^3$ but still requiring too much information.
Is there any way to use only some local information from a vector field and estimate the local vector potential? I don't need to know the entire vector potential and I don't have the entire vector field anyway. It seems to me it should be possible because from what I understand, the curl is defined as a limit and seems to be a local property. So can I reverse it locally? Any insight or references would be appreciated.
Just to clarify, I only have discrete (in space) numerical measurements of the vector field in a very small finite corner of $\mathbb{R}^3$ away from the origin. And I am hoping to use them to estimate the local vector potential numerically in the same corner.