Let $F(x,u,Du,D^2u)=0$ for $x\in\Omega$ be our equation of interest. One way of defining a viscosity subsolution is this:

We say $u$ is a viscosity subsolution iff for any test function $\phi\in C^2(\Omega)$ such that $u-\phi$ has a LOCAL maximum at $x_0$ then $F(x_0,D\phi(x_0),D^2\phi(x_0))\leq 0$.

However in this paper, definition 2.1 on page 6


the author replace the word local with GLOBAL. I believe this is fairly common in optimal control/stopping literature.

I think the answer is no, as long as we can solve this seemingy simple analysis question


but I have struggled to do this.


The answer is no, and how to solve the analysis question is explained in exercise 3.5 in Albert Fathi's lecture notes for example -there are other sources of course, but not freely available.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ That would do. If i write something on this, what should i reference? In the paper i referred to, i think this was just assumed. $\endgroup$ – lost1 Jan 15 '14 at 12:24
  • $\begingroup$ @lost1 you can quote Barles' book, for example, Guy Barles. Solutions de viscosit\´e des \´equations de Hamilton-Jacobi. Springer- Verlag, Paris, 1994. $\endgroup$ – username Jan 15 '14 at 12:43
  • $\begingroup$ I flipped through the content page and this book seems to be interested in first order only, am I mistaken? $\endgroup$ – lost1 Jan 15 '14 at 12:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @lost1 Viscosity solutions are introduced first for second order problem, as it is more 'natural' in this case, and then for first order. The general theory is done for both. $\endgroup$ – username Jan 15 '14 at 13:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.