I am sure this is well known, but I am not an expert...so I appreciate any help

Let $C \subset \mathbb{P}^3$ be the complete intersection of two hypersurfaces of degree $d_1$ and $d_2$. Let $U_{d_1,d_2}$ be the open loci, in the appropriate Hilbert scheme, that parametrize those curves. Hartshorne (Serre?) established a correspondence between this Hilbert scheme $U_{d_1,d_2}$ and the moduli space $M$ of some vector bundles of rank two in $\mathbb{P}^3$.

$\textbf{Question 1}$: Is this true? Where can I read about it?

This implies a compactification of $U_{d_1,d_2}$ will give us a compactification of the moduli space $M$ of those vector bundles.

$\textbf{Question 2}$: Is this a standard procedure for constructing meaningful compactifications of $M$ ?

$\textbf{Question 3}$: What is the situation for elliptic quartic curves ?



The Serre construction indeed associates to a curve $C$ in $\mathbb{P}^3$ satisfying certain conditions a vector bundle $E$ on $\mathbb{P}^3$ and a global section $s$ of $E$ such that $C$ is the zero set of $s$. But this is trivial for complete intersections: the vector bundle $E$ is just $\mathcal{O}(d_1)\oplus \mathcal{O}(d_2)$, with the section $(F_1,F_2)$, where $F_1=F_2=0$ are te equations of your curve.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I would add that since the vector bundle is not stable there is no moduli space to consider. Also I would suggest looking into Okonek--Schneider--Spindler book. $\endgroup$
    – Sasha
    Jan 10 '14 at 11:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.