2
$\begingroup$

Let $p$ be a prime, and let $\text{GL}_n \big( \Bbb{Z} / p^2 \Bbb{Z} \big)$ be the group of $n \times n$ invertible matrices over the ring $\Bbb{Z} / p^2 \Bbb{Z}$. Does there exist a positive integer $N$ depending on $p$ and $n$ such that the following identity is valid for any matrix $g$ in $\text{GL}_n \big( \Bbb{Z} / p^2 \Bbb{Z} \big)$ ?

\begin{equation} \text{tr} \big( g^N \big) - n \ = \ \text{det}^{p-1}(g) - 1 \end{equation}

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ this ought to be viewed as a $p$-analogue of the following trace identity for the $\text{GL_n}$-loop group, namely: $$\text{tr} \big( g^{-1} \, {dg \over {dt}} \big) \ = \ {d \over {dt}} \text{log} \, \text{det}(g) $$ $\endgroup$ – A. Leverkuhn Dec 9 '13 at 2:46
  • $\begingroup$ also when $n=2$ the value of $N$ should be $q^2 -1$. $\endgroup$ – A. Leverkuhn Dec 9 '13 at 2:52
  • $\begingroup$ ... sorry, that should be a $p^2 -1$ and not a $q^2 -1$ $\endgroup$ – A. Leverkuhn Dec 9 '13 at 3:15
6
$\begingroup$

Sorry, this is broken! Even when $n=2$, this doesn't work. Take $p=2$ and $A=\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2 \\ 1 & 1 \end{pmatrix}$. For all $N$, $Tr(A^N) \equiv 2 \bmod 4$. (Specifically, it is OEIS A002203.) And $\det A=-1$. So $Tr(A^N) - n \equiv 2-2 \equiv 0 \bmod 4$ and $\det(A)^{p-1}-1 \equiv -1 -1 \equiv 2 \bmod 4$.

The proof below works as long as the eigenvalues of $A$ are unramified over $\mathbb{Z}_p$. At first I thought that tame ramification might also be enough (which would happen when $n<p$), but it doesn't. Take $p=5$ and $$A=\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \\ 5 & 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}.$$ Then $\det(A)^{p-1} \equiv 21 \bmod 25$ but $Tr(A^N)$ is $3$, $13$ or $18 \bmod 25$ for all $N$. In general, if $$A=\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \\ p & 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix},$$ I get $Tr A^n \equiv 3+p 3 \binom{n}{3} \bmod p^2$ and $\det(A)^{p-1} \equiv 1-p \bmod{p^2}$. There is no particular reason that there has to be a solution to $3 \binom{n}{3} = -1$ modulo $p$ and, whenever there isn't, we lose.

I'll leave the previous answer standing below, as it explains why this works in the unramified case.


$\def\ZZ{\mathbb{Z}}$Yes, we can take $N = p^{n!}-1$.

Given $A \in GL_n(\ZZ/p^2)$, lift $A$ arbitrarily to $\tilde{A} \in GL_n(\ZZ_p)$. Let $\tilde{\lambda}_i$ be the eigenvalues of $\tilde{A}$; they live in the ring of integers of some finite extension of $\mathbb{Q}_p$. Let $\bar{A}$ be the reduction of $\tilde{A}$ modulo $p$ and $\bar{\lambda}_i$ be the reduction of $\tilde{\lambda_i}$ modulo $p$. Then $\bar{\lambda}_i$ is in $\mathbb{F}_{p^d}$ for some $d \leq n$. Moreover, since $\tilde{A}$ is invertible over $\ZZ_p$, we know that $\bar{\lambda}_i \neq 0$.

Let $\tau_i$ be the Teichmuller lift of $\bar{\lambda_i}$. So $\tau_i^N=1$. THIS IS THE BROKEN STEP: Write $\tilde{\lambda}_i = \tau_i (1+p \alpha_i)$. The left hand side of your equation is $$\sum_i \tau_i^N (1+p \alpha_i)^N -n = \sum_i (1+p \alpha_i)^N -n \equiv n + p N \sum_i \alpha_i -n \equiv -p \sum \alpha_i \bmod p^2.$$

On the right hand side, notice that $\prod \tau_i$ must be the Teichmuller lift of $\prod \bar{\lambda}_i = \det(\bar{A})$. Since $\det(\bar{A}) \in \mathbb{F}_p^{\ast}$, this shows that $\left( \prod \tau_i \right)^{p-1}=1$. So your right hand side is $$\prod \tau_i^{p-1} (1+p \alpha_i)^{p-1}-1 = \prod (1+p \alpha_i)^{p-1}-1 \equiv -p \sum \alpha_i \bmod p^2.$$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ ok --- wow ! is this something that's already known ? best, a. leverkuhn $\endgroup$ – A. Leverkuhn Dec 9 '13 at 15:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I hadn't seen it before, but that doesn't mean much. It seem to me like the kind of formula that is easier to prove than to conjecture. $\endgroup$ – David E Speyer Dec 9 '13 at 17:18
  • $\begingroup$ could the problem could be circumvented if the matrix $g$ is assumed to be in $\text{SL}_n \big(\Bbb{Z} / p^2 \Bbb{Z} \big)$ or in the $n \times n$ orthogonal group over $\Bbb{Z} / p^2 \Bbb{Z}$ --- i.e. $\text{tr} \big( g^N \big) = 0 \, \text{mod} \, p^2$ ? $\endgroup$ – A. Leverkuhn Dec 10 '13 at 18:45
  • $\begingroup$ I don't understand the i.e.: For $N$ sufficiently divisible, $Tr(g^N)$ should be $n \mod p$, not $0 \mod p$. In any case, I am pessimistic. $\endgroup$ – David E Speyer Dec 10 '13 at 19:06
  • $\begingroup$ sorry --- $\text{tr}\big( g^N \big) - n = 0 \, \text{mod} \, p^2$. $\endgroup$ – A. Leverkuhn Dec 11 '13 at 1:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.