2
$\begingroup$

The only definition that I have ever seen of this Riemann-Hurtwitz zeta-function is this,

For $0 < a \leq 1$ we have the identity $$ \zeta(z, a) = \frac{2 \Gamma(1 - z)}{(2 \pi)^{1-z}} \left[\sin \frac{z \pi}{2} \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{\cos 2 \pi a n}{n^{1-z}} + \cos \frac{z \pi}{2} \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{\sin 2 \pi a n}{n^{1-z}} \right] \,$$

  • Now from this (or otherwise!) how do I show that, $\xi(s,\frac{1}{2}) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{ (n + \frac{1}{2} )^s }$

  • It seems that for any $k$ even and $d$ a positive integer there is such a sum over inverse powers representation of $\xi(s-k,\frac{d}{2}-1 )$ - it would be great to know if there is a general expression here!

  • Any insight/motivation about this $\xi(z,a)$ function would be a great help.

$\endgroup$
6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Is $\zeta$ same as $\xi$? $\endgroup$
    – user11000
    Dec 8, 2013 at 4:59
  • $\begingroup$ A functional equation might help. $\endgroup$ Dec 8, 2013 at 5:59
  • $\begingroup$ @user17762 Yes! Sorry for the typo! $\endgroup$
    – user6818
    Dec 8, 2013 at 7:38
  • $\begingroup$ @MustafaSaid May be you can elaborate... $\endgroup$
    – user6818
    Dec 8, 2013 at 7:38
  • $\begingroup$ @user6818, the Hurwitz zeta function satisfies the functional equation, $\zeta(1-s, \frac{m}{n}) = \frac{2 \Gamma (s)}{(2 \pi n)^s} \sum_{k=1}^n [\cos(\frac{\pi s}{2} - \frac{2\pi km}{n}) \zeta(s, k/n)]$ that holds for all values of $s$ and integers, $1 \leq m \leq n$. Now let $m/n = 1/2$ and compare both sides of the functional equation. I suspect that this will give you the desired expression for $\zeta(s, 1/2)$. $\endgroup$ Dec 8, 2013 at 8:23

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

The definition of the Hurwitz-Riemann $\zeta$ function is:

\begin{eqnarray} \zeta(s, x) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{(n+x)^s} \quad , \quad x>0 \end{eqnarray} with $s \in \mathbb{C} \; , \; \mathrm{Re}(s)>1$.

If $x=1$, Hurwitz-Riemann Zeta-function is reduced the original Riemann Zeta function. That is, by default we assume $\zeta(s,1)=\zeta(s)$.

Now, there are hundreds of representations of the Hurwitz-Riemann Zeta-function. The one you show is just one of them.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.