Notion of finite dimensional simplicial space I was wondering, what a $N$-dimensional simplicial space $X$ should be. Of course the degeneracy maps force the spaces to be nonempty in high dimensions. Currently I have two different versions and i am wondering whether they are equivalent:
1) There are no nondegenerate simplexes above dimension $N$. 
2) Let $\Delta|_N$ be the full subcategory of $\Delta$ consisting of the objects $[0],\ldots ,[N]$. The inclusion induces a restriction functor $R$ from $\Delta-$spaces to $\Delta|_N$-spaces, which has a left adjoint $L$. There is a canonical map $L(R(X))\rightarrow X$. $X$ should be called $N$-dimensional, iff this map is an isomorphism,i.e. a homeomorphism on each object of $\Delta$.
To make the question more precise: $2)\Rightarrow 1)$ can be easily seen, as the map $L(R(X))\rightarrow X$ cannot hit any nondegenerate simplex above dimension $N$ by construction. The other way round:
Given $1)$, then all the maps occuring in the natural transformation are surjective and continuous. Injectivity should follow from the relations in $\Delta$. So why is the inverse map of sets continuous?
(In the category of simplicial sets (and not spaces) both notions should be equivalent using the same argumentation.)
 A: Interesting question!
I'm cautiously optimistic that 1) $\Rightarrow$ 2).  As you say, if $X$ satisfies 1), then  $L(R(X))\to X$ is a continuous bijection.  (Because it's a statement about point-sets, and the thing is true for simplicial sets.)
If $N=0$, it should be easy:  $L(R(X))$ is the constant simplicial space, whose value at each [k] is $X_0=X([0])$.  The canonical map $L(R(X))\to X$ is the one which at degree $k$ is given by the map $s:X_0\to X_k$ defined by the composite of degeneracy operators.  But we know that the composite $X_0\to X_k\to X_0$ is the identity, where $d:X_k\to X_0$ is a composite of face operators.  So if $s$ is a bijection, $d$ is its continuous inverse.
For general $N$, let $Y=L(R(X))$.  The functor $R$ also has a right adjoint, which I'll call $M$.  Let $Z=M(R(X))$.  Just as the space $Y_k$ looks like a colimit of a certain diagram of the spaces $X_0,\dots,X_N$, the space $Z_k$ looks like a limit of a certain diagram of these spaces.
There are canonical maps $Y=L(R(X)) \to X \to M(R(X))=Z$.  I would like to claim that the composite $f:Y\to Z$ gives a homeomorphism of $Y$ onto its image.  If you can prove this, that will give your result, since a continuous inverse to $Y\to X$ will be given by $X\to f(Y)\approx Y$.
A: OK I checked, how the adjoint functors looks like. Given any $\Delta|_N $ simplicial space $X$. To define $L(X)$, we have to extend $X$ to the whole category $\Delta$. I am just telling, what $L(X)$ does on $[N+1]$. Then you keep extending the functor in the same way:
$L(X)([N+1]):=(0,\ldots,N)\times X([N])/\sim$, where the equivalence relation is given by 
$(j,s_k(x))\sim (k+1,s_j(x))$ for $0\le j\le k\le N,x\in X[N-1]$. The $i$-th degeneracy map is induced by the inclusion of the i-th summand. Using the relations in $\Delta$ one can also define the face maps.
The right adjoint functor is given by
$M(X)([N+1]):= ( (x_0,\ldots,x_{N+1})|\partial_ix_j=\partial_{j-1}x_i\mbox{ for } 0 \le i < j \le N+1 )\subset \prod_{i=0}^{N+1}X[N]$. The face maps are just the projections and one can define the degeneracy maps using the relations in $\Delta$.
So let $X$ be a $\Delta$-space. The natural transformation is given by 
$L(R(X))([N+1])\rightarrow M(R(X))([N+1])\qquad (i,x)\mapsto (\partial_0 s_i(x),\ldots,\partial_{N+1} s_i(x))$.
Using the relations in $\Delta$ one can show, that this map is injective. So the remaining question is, whether this map is an open map (considered as a map onto the image). 
A: I just wanted to write a comment, that I could show the upper equivalence conly for simplicial sets and simplicial Hausdorff spaces (but this answer is too long for a comment).
This question still makes sense in other categories replacing 1) by 
1') The span of all degenerate subobjects $s_0(X([N-1])),\ldots,s_{N-1}(X([N-1]))$ is the whole of $X([N-1])$.
For example it fails in the category of simplicial groups. There are two simplicial groups $X$ and $Y$ , whose restrictions to $\Delta|_1$ agree. But if you consider the span of all degenerate elements in $X([2])$ resp. $Y([2])$  those spans are not isomorphic.
Consider the simplicial set $S$ with one 0-simplex $a$ and 1 nondegenerate 1-simplex $b$. Define $X([k]):=Y([k]):=\mathbb{Z}(S([k])$ for $k=0,1$. Then you can define $X([2])$ as $\mathbb{Z}(a,s_0(b),s_1(b))$ and $Y([2])$ as $\mathbb{Z}(a)\times F(s_0(b),s_1(b))$, where $F(s_0(b),s_1(b))$ denotes the free group in $s_0(b),s_1(b)$.
The face and degeneracy maps in $S$ induce in both cases well defined face and degeneracy maps. Hence this shows, that $X$ and $Y$ give a counterexample.
