1
$\begingroup$

Let $X \subset \mathbb C^2$ be a Riemann surface with boundary $\partial X \subset \mathbb C^2$ and without compact components. Let $\bar X = X \cup \{p_1,\ldots,p_N\} \subseteq \mathbb CP^2$ be its compactification. Is it known how to find $N$ given $\partial X$ and is it possible?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The points $p_i$ do not seem to be dependent of the boundary in $\mathbb{C}^2$. If your Riemann surface is given by one algebraic equation, you homogeneise the equation and easily get the points. $\endgroup$ – Jérémy Blanc Nov 29 '13 at 13:39
  • $\begingroup$ @JérémyBlanc but there is only one Riemann surface without compact components with given boundary, so the boundary defines these points $p_1$, $\ldots$, $p_N$, no, I have no equation, only the boundary given numerically $\endgroup$ – Appliqué Nov 29 '13 at 13:42
  • $\begingroup$ You probably mean that there is only one up to isomorphisms, but not viewed in $\mathbb{C}^2$. For example, $x=0$ and $x=y^2$ are the same up to change of coordinates and in both cases you have $N=1$. However, it seems to me that the "boundary $\delta X$" that you consider can be anything for this equation. No ? $\endgroup$ – Jérémy Blanc Nov 29 '13 at 13:51
  • $\begingroup$ @JérémyBlanc Sorry, do you mean that given a boundary $\gamma \subset \mathbb C^2$ of some Riemann surface without compact components in $\mathbb C^2$ (viewed in $\mathbb C^2$) we can find two Riemann surfaces without compact components $X_1$, $X_2$ with different number of points at infinity and so that $\partial X_1 = \partial X_2 = \gamma$? If it isn't impossible, then $\gamma$ defines $N$, no? $\endgroup$ – Appliqué Nov 29 '13 at 14:06
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe I did not get the question. Let us denote by $Y\subset \mathbb{C}^2$ the closure of $X$ ($Y=X\cup \partial X$) and by $Z\subset \mathbb{P}^2$ the closure in $\mathbb{P}^2$. Then, $Z$ is uniquely determined by $Y$, so the number of points at infinity is also given by $Y=X\cup \partial X$. I thought that the points $p_1,\dots,p_n$ were $Z\setminus Y$ but it seem that you want $Z\setminus X$. Sorry. Anyway, if you want to find the points, just look at the equation. If you do not have the equation, the boundary depends also on $X$ and not only on $\partial X$ of course. $\endgroup$ – Jérémy Blanc Dec 1 '13 at 11:01

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.